REPCO

{
    key:"uid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
    key:"title": {
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG is even worse than coal"
        }
    },
    key:"subtitle": {},
    key:"summary": {
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was</p>\n"
        }
    },
    key:"content": {
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was published just weeks before the World LNG Summit in Berlin started, where different corporations are pushing for more LNG being used as a so-called bridge technology to cover energy needs during the European transition to renewable energies. While it comes as no surprise that LNG will also further add to climate change as a fossil fuel, the fact that it is even worse than coal, from which Germany has started transitioning away much quicker, provides facts to support the argument that the European focus on LNG as a source of energy is a massive misjudgment. In conversation with Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explains what the results of the study mean and which aspects surround this issue.</p>\n<p>You can read the full study here: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>\n"
        }
    },
    key:"titleTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG е дори по-лошо от въглищата",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG je ještě horší než uhlí",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG is even worse than coal",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"Το LNG είναι ακόμη χειρότερο από τον άνθρακα",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG is even worse than coal",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG es incluso peor que el carbón",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG on jopa pahempaa kuin hiili",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG est même pire que le charbon",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG je čak gori od ugljena",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"A LNG még rosszabb, mint a szén",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG è anche peggio del carbone",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG is zelfs erger dan kolen",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG jest nawet gorsze niż węgiel",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG é ainda pior do que o carvão",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG este chiar mai rău decât cărbunele",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG даже хуже угля",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG je ešte horšie ako uhlie",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG är till och med värre än kol",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG, kömürden daha da kötü.",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"LNG навіть гірше, ніж вугілля",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        }
    },
    key:"subtitleTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        }
    },
    key:"summaryTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Това е заключението на ново проучване от Робърт Хауърт, професор по екология и екологична биология в Колежа по земеделие и науки за живота на Корнелския университет в Ню Йорк. Неговото проучване за въглеродния отпечатък беше</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To je závěr nové studie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologie a environmentální biologie na College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho studie o uhlíkové stopě skleníkových plynů byla</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was</p>\n",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Αυτή είναι η σύγκριση μιας νέας μελέτης από τον Robert Howarth, τον καθηγητή David R. Atkinson στην Οικολογία και τη Βιολογία του Περιβάλλοντος στο Κολέγιο Γεωργίας και Επιστημών Ζωής του Πανεπιστημίου Cornell στη Νέα Υόρκη. Η μελέτη του σχετικά με το αποτύπωμα του θερμοκηπίου ήταν</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Esa es la conclusión de un nuevo estudio de Robert Howarth, el Profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecología y Biología Ambiental en el Colegio de Agricultura y Ciencias de la Vida de la Universidad de Cornell en Nueva York. Su estudio sobre la huella de gases de efecto invernadero fue</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Tämä on johtopäätös uudesta tutkimuksesta, jonka on tehnyt Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinsonin ekologian ja ympäristön biologian professori Cornellin yliopiston maatalous- ja elämätieteiden korkeakoulussa New Yorkissa. Hänen tutkimuksensa kasvihuonekaasupäästöistä oli</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>C'est la conclusion d'une nouvelle étude de Robert Howarth, le professeur David R. Atkinson d'écologie et de biologie environnementale au Collège d'agriculture et des sciences de la vie de l'Université Cornell à New York. Son étude sur l'empreinte de gaz à effet de serre était</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To je zaključak nove studije Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologije i okolišne biologije David R. Atkinson na Fakultetu za poljoprivredu i znanosti o životu Sveučilišta Cornell u New Yorku. Njegova studija o stakleničkom otisku bila je</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Ez a következtetése egy új tanulmánynak, amelyet Robert Howarth, a Cornell Egyetem Mezőgazdasági és Élettudományi Karának Ökológiai és Környezeti Biológiai David R. Atkinson professzora készített New Yorkban. A tanulmánya az üvegházhatású gázok lábnyomáról szólt</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Questa è la conclusione di un nuovo studio di Robert Howarth, il Professore David R. Atkinson di Ecologia e Biologia Ambientale nel College of Agriculture and Life Sciences della Cornell University a New York. Il suo studio sull'impronta di gas serra è stato</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Dat is de conclusie van een nieuwe studie door Robert Howarth, de David R. Atkinson Professor in Ecologie en Milieu Biologie aan het College voor Landbouw en Levenswetenschappen van de Cornell Universiteit in New York. Zijn studie over de broeikasvoetafdruk was</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To jest konkluzja nowego badania przeprowadzonego przez Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologii i biologii środowiskowej imienia Davida R. Atkinsona w Kolegium Rolnictwa i Nauk o Życiu Uniwersytetu Cornell w Nowym Jorku. Jego badanie dotyczące śladu węglowego było</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Essa é a conclusão de um novo estudo de Robert Howarth, o Professor David R. Atkinson de Ecologia e Biologia Ambiental na Faculdade de Agricultura e Ciências da Vida da Universidade Cornell em Nova York. Seu estudo sobre a pegada de gases de efeito estufa foi</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Asta este concluzia unui nou studiu realizat de Robert Howarth, profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecologie și Biologie a Mediului în Colegiul de Agricultură și Științe ale Vieții de la Universitatea Cornell din New York. Studiul său despre amprenta de seră a fost</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To je záver novej štúdie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekológie a environmentálnej biológie na David R. Atkinson College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho štúdia o uhlíkovej stope skleníkových plynov bola</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Det är slutsatsen av en ny studie av Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinson-professorn i ekologi och miljöbiologi vid College of Agriculture and Life Sciences vid Cornell University i New York. Hans studie om växthusavtrycket var</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Bu, New York'taki Cornell Üniversitesi Tarım ve Hayat Bilimleri Fakültesi'nde Ekoloji ve Çevresel Biyoloji David R. Atkinson Profesörü Robert Howarth tarafından yapılan yeni bir çalışmanın sonucudur. Sera gazı ayak izi üzerine yaptığı çalışma</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        }
    },
    key:"contentTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Това е заключението на ново проучване от Робърт Хауърт, професор по екология и екологична биология в Колежа по земеделие и науки за живота на Корнелския университет в Ню Йорк. Неговото проучване за въглеродния отпечатък беше публикувано само седмици преди Световната среща на върха за втечнен природен газ в Берлин, където различни корпорации настояват за по-широкото използване на ВПГ като т.нар. мостова технология за покриване на енергийните нужди по време на европейския преход към възобновяеми източници на енергия. Докато не е изненада, че ВПГ също ще допринесе за климатичните промени като изкопаемо гориво, фактът, че е дори по-лошо от въглищата, от които Германия започна да се отдалечава много по-бързо, предоставя факти, които подкрепят аргумента, че европейският фокус върху ВПГ като източник на енергия е огромна грешка в преценката. В разговор с Радио Коракс, Робърт Хауърт обяснява какво означават резултатите от проучването и кои аспекти заобикалят този въпрос.</p>\n<p>Можете да прочетете пълното проучване тук: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To je závěr nové studie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologie a environmentální biologie na College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho studie o uhlíkové stopě skleníkových plynů byla publikována jen několik týdnů před začátkem Světového summitu o LNG v Berlíně, kde různé korporace prosazují větší využívání LNG jako takzvané přechodné technologie k pokrytí energetických potřeb během evropského přechodu na obnovitelné energie. I když není překvapením, že LNG také dále přispěje ke změně klimatu jako fosilní palivo, skutečnost, že je to ještě horší než uhlí, od kterého se Německo začalo odklánět mnohem rychleji, poskytuje fakta na podporu argumentu, že evropské zaměření na LNG jako zdroj energie je obrovským omylem. V rozhovoru s Radio Corax Robert Howarth vysvětluje, co výsledky studie znamenají a jaké aspekty tuto problematiku obklopují.</p>\n<p>Celou studii si můžete přečíst zde: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was published just weeks before the World LNG Summit in Berlin started, where different corporations are pushing for more LNG being used as a so-called bridge technology to cover energy needs during the European transition to renewable energies. While it comes as no surprise that LNG will also further add to climate change as a fossil fuel, the fact that it is even worse than coal, from which Germany has started transitioning away much quicker, provides facts to support the argument that the European focus on LNG as a source of energy is a massive misjudgment. In conversation with Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explains what the results of the study mean and which aspects surround this issue.</p>\n<p>You can read the full study here: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>\n",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Αυτή είναι η σύγκριση μιας νέας μελέτης από τον Robert Howarth, τον καθηγητή Οικολογίας και Περιβαλλοντικής Βιολογίας David R. Atkinson στο Κολέγιο Γεωργίας και Επιστημών Ζωής του Πανεπιστημίου Cornell στη Νέα Υόρκη. Η μελέτη του σχετικά με το αποτύπωμα του θερμοκηπίου δημοσιεύθηκε μόλις εβδομάδες πριν από την έναρξη της Παγκόσμιας Συνόδου LNG στο Βερολίνο, όπου διάφορες εταιρείες πιέζουν για περισσότερη χρήση LNG ως μια λεγόμενη γέφυρα τεχνολογία για να καλύψουν τις ενεργειακές ανάγκες κατά τη διάρκεια της ευρωπαϊκής μετάβασης σε ανανεώσιμες πηγές ενέργειας. Ενώ δεν προκαλεί έκπληξη ότι το LNG θα προσθέσει επίσης στην κλιματική αλλαγή ως ορυκτό καύσιμο, το γεγονός ότι είναι ακόμη χειρότερο από τον άνθρακα, από τον οποίο η Γερμανία έχει αρχίσει να απομακρύνεται πολύ πιο γρήγορα, παρέχει στοιχεία που υποστηρίζουν την άποψη ότι η ευρωπαϊκή εστίαση στο LNG ως πηγή ενέργειας είναι μια τεράστια λανθασμένη εκτίμηση. Σε συνομιλία με το Radio Corax, ο Robert Howarth εξηγεί τι σημαίνουν τα αποτελέσματα της μελέτης και ποια ζητήματα περιβάλλουν αυτό το θέμα.</p>\n<p>Μπορείτε να διαβάσετε τη πλήρη μελέτη εδώ: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was published just weeks before the World LNG Summit in Berlin started, where different corporations are pushing for more LNG being used as a so-called bridge technology to cover energy needs during the European transition to renewable energies. While it comes as no surprise that LNG will also further add to climate change as a fossil fuel, the fact that it is even worse than coal, from which Germany has started transitioning away much quicker, provides facts to support the argument that the European focus on LNG as a source of energy is a massive misjudgment. In conversation with Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explains what the results of the study mean and which aspects surround this issue.</p>\n<p>You can read the full study here: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Esa es la conclusión de un nuevo estudio de Robert Howarth, el Profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecología y Biología Ambiental en el Colegio de Agricultura y Ciencias de la Vida de la Universidad de Cornell en Nueva York. Su estudio sobre la huella de gases de efecto invernadero fue publicado solo unas semanas antes de que comenzara la Cumbre Mundial de GNL en Berlín, donde diferentes corporaciones están presionando para que se use más GNL como una supuesta tecnología puente para cubrir las necesidades energéticas durante la transición europea a energías renovables. Si bien no es una sorpresa que el GNL también contribuirá al cambio climático como un combustible fósil, el hecho de que sea incluso peor que el carbón, del cual Alemania ha comenzado a alejarse mucho más rápido, proporciona hechos que respaldan el argumento de que el enfoque europeo en el GNL como fuente de energía es un gran error de juicio. En conversación con Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explica lo que significan los resultados del estudio y qué aspectos rodean este tema.</p>\n<p>Puedes leer el estudio completo aquí: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Tämä on johtopäätös uudesta tutkimuksesta, jonka on tehnyt Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinsonin ekologian ja ympäristön biologian professori Cornellin yliopiston maatalous- ja elämätieteiden korkeakoulussa New Yorkissa. Hänen tutkimuksensa kasvihuonekaasupäästöistä julkaistiin vain viikkoja ennen Berliinissä alkavaa Maailman LNG-huippukokousta, jossa eri yritykset ajavat LNG:n käytön lisäämistä niin sanottuna siirtymäteknologiana energian tarpeiden kattamiseksi Euroopan siirtyessä uusiutuviin energialähteisiin. Vaikka ei ole yllätys, että LNG lisää myös ilmastonmuutosta fossiilisena polttoaineena, se, että se on jopa pahempaa kuin hiili, josta Saksa on alkanut siirtyä pois paljon nopeammin, tarjoaa todisteita tukemaan väitettä, että Euroopan keskittyminen LNG:hen energialähteenä on valtava virhearvio. Keskustellessaan Radio Coraxin kanssa Robert Howarth selittää, mitä tutkimuksen tulokset tarkoittavat ja mitkä näkökohdat liittyvät tähän asiaan.</p>\n<p>Voit lukea koko tutkimuksen täältä: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>C'est la conclusion d'une nouvelle étude de Robert Howarth, professeur David R. Atkinson d'écologie et de biologie environnementale au Collège des sciences agricoles et de la vie de l'Université Cornell à New York. Son étude sur l'empreinte de gaz à effet de serre a été publiée quelques semaines avant le Sommet mondial sur le GNL à Berlin, où différentes entreprises plaident pour une utilisation accrue du GNL en tant que soi-disant technologie de transition pour répondre aux besoins énergétiques pendant la transition européenne vers les énergies renouvelables. Bien qu'il ne soit pas surprenant que le GNL contribue également au changement climatique en tant que combustible fossile, le fait qu'il soit même pire que le charbon, dont l'Allemagne a commencé à s'éloigner beaucoup plus rapidement, fournit des faits pour soutenir l'argument selon lequel l'accent mis par l'Europe sur le GNL en tant que source d'énergie est une énorme erreur de jugement. Dans une conversation avec Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explique ce que signifient les résultats de l'étude et quels aspects entourent cette question.</p>\n<p>Vous pouvez lire l'étude complète ici : https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To je zaključak nove studije Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologije i okolišne biologije David R. Atkinson na Fakultetu poljoprivrede i znanosti o životu Sveučilišta Cornell u New Yorku. Njegova studija o ekološkom otisku stakleničkih plinova objavljena je samo nekoliko tjedana prije nego što je započeo Svjetski LNG summit u Berlinu, gdje različite korporacije traže veće korištenje LNG-a kao takozvane mostne tehnologije za pokrivanje energetskih potreba tijekom europske tranzicije na obnovljive izvore energije. Iako nije iznenađujuće da će LNG također dodatno pridonijeti klimatskim promjenama kao fosilno gorivo, činjenica da je čak i gori od ugljena, od kojeg je Njemačka počela brže se udaljavati, pruža činjenice koje podržavaju tvrdnju da je europski fokus na LNG kao izvor energije ogromna pogrešna procjena. U razgovoru s Radiom Corax, Robert Howarth objašnjava što rezultati studije znače i koji aspekti okružuju ovo pitanje.</p>\n<p>Možete pročitati cijelu studiju ovdje: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Ez Robert Howarth, a Cornell Egyetem Mezőgazdasági és Élettudományi Karának Ökológiai és Környezeti Biológiai David R. Atkinson Professzora által végzett új tanulmány következtetése. A tanulmány a üvegházhatású gázok lábnyomáról készült, és néhány héttel a berlini Világ LNG Csúcs előtt publikálták, ahol különböző vállalatok arra törekednek, hogy az LNG-t mint úgynevezett átmeneti technológiát használják az energiaigények kielégítésére az európai megújuló energiákra való átállás során. Mivel nem meglepő, hogy az LNG, mint fosszilis tüzelőanyag, továbbra is hozzájárul a klímaváltozáshoz, az a tény, hogy még rosszabb, mint a szén, amelytől Németország sokkal gyorsabban kezdett el átállni, olyan tényeket szolgáltat, amelyek alátámasztják azt az érvet, hogy az európai LNG-re való fókuszálás az energiaforrásként hatalmas tévedés. A Radio Corax-szal folytatott beszélgetésében Robert Howarth elmagyarázza, mit jelentenek a tanulmány eredményei, és mely aspektusok övezik ezt a kérdést.</p>\n<p>Teljes tanulmányt itt olvashatja: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Questa è la conclusione di un nuovo studio di Robert Howarth, il Professore David R. Atkinson di Ecologia e Biologia Ambientale nel College of Agriculture and Life Sciences della Cornell University a New York. Il suo studio sull'impronta di gas serra è stato pubblicato solo poche settimane prima dell'inizio del World LNG Summit a Berlino, dove diverse corporazioni stanno spingendo per un maggiore utilizzo del GNL come cosiddetta tecnologia ponte per coprire i bisogni energetici durante la transizione europea verso le energie rinnovabili. Sebbene non sorprenda che il GNL contribuirà ulteriormente al cambiamento climatico come combustibile fossile, il fatto che sia addirittura peggiore del carbone, dal quale la Germania ha iniziato a distaccarsi molto più rapidamente, fornisce fatti a sostegno dell'argomento che il focus europeo sul GNL come fonte di energia sia un enorme errore di valutazione. In conversazione con Radio Corax, Robert Howarth spiega cosa significano i risultati dello studio e quali aspetti circondano questa questione.</p>\n<p>Puoi leggere lo studio completo qui: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Dat is de conclusie van een nieuwe studie door Robert Howarth, de David R. Atkinson Professor in Ecologie en Milieu Biologie aan het College voor Landbouw en Levenswetenschappen van de Cornell Universiteit in New York. Zijn studie over de broeikasvoetafdruk werd gepubliceerd enkele weken voordat de World LNG Summit in Berlijn begon, waar verschillende bedrijven pleiten voor meer LNG als een zogenaamde brugtechnologie om in de energiebehoeften te voorzien tijdens de Europese overgang naar hernieuwbare energie. Hoewel het geen verrassing is dat LNG ook verder bijdraagt aan klimaatverandering als fossiele brandstof, biedt het feit dat het zelfs erger is dan kolen, waar Duitsland veel sneller van af begint te komen, feiten ter ondersteuning van het argument dat de Europese focus op LNG als energiebron een enorme miscalculatie is. In gesprek met Radio Corax legt Robert Howarth uit wat de resultaten van de studie betekenen en welke aspecten deze kwestie omringen.</p>\n<p>Je kunt de volledige studie hier lezen: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To jest konkluzja nowego badania przeprowadzonego przez Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologii i biologii środowiskowej na Uniwersytecie Cornell w Nowym Jorku. Jego badanie dotyczące śladu węglowego zostało opublikowane zaledwie kilka tygodni przed rozpoczęciem Światowego Szczytu LNG w Berlinie, gdzie różne korporacje naciskają na większe wykorzystanie LNG jako tzw. technologii mostu, aby zaspokoić potrzeby energetyczne podczas europejskiej transformacji w kierunku energii odnawialnej. Choć nie jest zaskoczeniem, że LNG również przyczyni się do zmian klimatycznych jako paliwo kopalne, fakt, że jest jeszcze gorsze niż węgiel, od którego Niemcy zaczęły odchodzić znacznie szybciej, dostarcza faktów wspierających argument, że europejskie skupienie się na LNG jako źródle energii jest ogromnym błędem osądów. W rozmowie z Radiem Corax Robert Howarth wyjaśnia, co oznaczają wyniki badania i jakie aspekty otaczają tę kwestię.</p>\n<p>Pełne badanie można przeczytać tutaj: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Essa é a conclusão de um novo estudo de Robert Howarth, o Professor David R. Atkinson de Ecologia e Biologia Ambiental na Faculdade de Agricultura e Ciências da Vida da Universidade Cornell em Nova York. Seu estudo sobre a pegada de gases de efeito estufa foi publicado apenas algumas semanas antes do início da Cúpula Mundial de GNL em Berlim, onde diferentes corporações estão pressionando para que mais GNL seja utilizado como uma chamada tecnologia de transição para cobrir as necessidades energéticas durante a transição europeia para energias renováveis. Embora não seja surpresa que o GNL também contribua para a mudança climática como um combustível fóssil, o fato de que ele é ainda pior que o carvão, do qual a Alemanha começou a se afastar muito mais rapidamente, fornece fatos que apoiam o argumento de que o foco europeu no GNL como fonte de energia é um enorme erro de julgamento. Em conversa com a Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explica o que os resultados do estudo significam e quais aspectos cercam essa questão.</p>\n<p>Você pode ler o estudo completo aqui: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Asta este concluzia unui nou studiu realizat de Robert Howarth, profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecologie și Biologie de Mediu în Colegiul de Agricultură și Științe ale Vieții de la Universitatea Cornell din New York. Studiul său despre amprenta de seră a fost publicat cu câteva săptămâni înainte de începerea Summit-ului Mondial LNG de la Berlin, unde diferite corporații promovează utilizarea mai multor LNG ca o așa-numită tehnologie de tranziție pentru a acoperi nevoile energetice în timpul tranziției europene către energii regenerabile. Deși nu este o surpriză că LNG va contribui și el la schimbările climatice ca combustibil fosil, faptul că este chiar mai rău decât cărbunele, de la care Germania a început să se abată mult mai repede, oferă fapte care susțin argumentul că focalizarea europeană pe LNG ca sursă de energie este o eroare masivă de judecată. Într-o conversație cu Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explică ce înseamnă rezultatele studiului și ce aspecte înconjoară această problemă.</p>\n<p>Puteți citi studiul complet aici: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>To je záver novej štúdie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekológie a environmentálnej biológie na David R. Atkinson College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho štúdia o uhlíkovej stope skleníkových plynov bola publikovaná len niekoľko týždňov pred začiatkom Svetového LNG summitu v Berlíne, kde rôzne korporácie tlačia na väčšie využívanie LNG ako takzvanej mostnej technológie na pokrytie energetických potrieb počas európskej transformácie na obnoviteľné energie. Hoci nie je prekvapením, že LNG tiež ďalej prispeje k zmene klímy ako fosílne palivo, fakt, že je to ešte horšie ako uhlie, od ktorého sa Nemecko začalo odkláňať oveľa rýchlejšie, poskytuje fakty na podporu argumentu, že európsky dôraz na LNG ako zdroj energie je obrovské zlyhanie. V rozhovore s Rádiom Corax Robert Howarth vysvetľuje, čo výsledky štúdie znamenajú a aké aspekty obklopujú túto problematiku.</p>\n<p>Môžete si prečítať celú štúdiu tu: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Detta är slutsatsen av en ny studie av Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinson-professor i ekologi och miljöbiologi vid College of Agriculture and Life Sciences vid Cornell University i New York. Hans studie om växthusgasavtrycket publicerades bara veckor innan World LNG Summit i Berlin började, där olika företag trycker på för att mer LNG ska användas som en så kallad broteknologi för att täcka energibehoven under den europeiska övergången till förnybara energikällor. Medan det inte kommer som någon överraskning att LNG också kommer att ytterligare bidra till klimatförändringar som en fossilt bränsle, ger det faktum att det är ännu värre än kol, från vilket Tyskland har börjat övergå mycket snabbare, fakta som stöder argumentet att det europeiska fokuset på LNG som en energikälla är en massiv felbedömning. I en intervju med Radio Corax förklarar Robert Howarth vad resultaten av studien betyder och vilka aspekter som omger denna fråga.</p>\n<p>Du kan läsa hela studien här: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Bu, New York'taki Cornell Üniversitesi Tarım ve Hayat Bilimleri Koleji'nde Ekoloji ve Çevresel Biyoloji David R. Atkinson Profesörü Robert Howarth tarafından yapılan yeni bir çalışmanın sonucudur. Sera gazı ayak izi üzerine yaptığı çalışma, Berlin'de başlayan Dünya LNG Zirvesi'nden sadece birkaç hafta önce yayımlandı; burada farklı şirketler, Avrupa'nın yenilenebilir enerjiye geçişi sırasında enerji ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için LNG'nin bir köprü teknolojisi olarak daha fazla kullanılmasını savunuyor. LNG'nin bir fosil yakıt olarak iklim değişikliğine daha fazla katkıda bulunacağı sürpriz değilken, Almanya'nın çok daha hızlı bir şekilde geçiş yaptığı kömürden daha kötü olduğu gerçeği, Avrupa'nın enerji kaynağı olarak LNG'ye odaklanmasının büyük bir yanlış anlama olduğunu destekleyen veriler sunuyor. Radio Corax ile yaptığı röportajda, Robert Howarth çalışmanın sonuçlarının ne anlama geldiğini ve bu konuyla ilgili hangi yönlerin bulunduğunu açıklıyor.</p>\n<p>Tam çalışmayı burada okuyabilirsiniz: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": null:null,
            key:"engine": null:null
        }
    },
    key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
    key:"pubDate": string:"2024-12-09T15:21:27",
    key:"contentUrl": {
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromContentUrl": boolean:true,
            key:"firstLanguage": boolean:true
        },
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"sr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"https://cba.media/688488",
            key:"fromLang": string:"de"
        }
    },
    key:"languageDetails": {
        key:"OriginalLanguages": number:1,
        key:"ContentItemLanguages": number:1,
        key:"ContentItemTranslations": number:21
    },
    key:"originalLanguages": {
        key:"language_codes": [
            string:"de"
        ]
    },
    key:"revision": {
        key:"dateModified": string:"2024-12-09T15:58:43.037",
        key:"__typename": string:"Revision"
    },
    key:"mediaAssets": {
        key:"nodes": [
            {
                key:"uid": string:"eayunq366nodar6ihlsmpylz254",
                key:"mediaType": string:"audio",
                key:"title": {
                    key:"de": {
                        key:"value": string:"LNG is even worse than coal"
                    }
                },
                key:"duration": null:null,
                key:"files": {
                    key:"nodes": [
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://cba.media/wp-content/uploads/0/9/0000688490/20241209-lngisevenwor-132380.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        }
                    ],
                    key:"__typename": string:"MediaAssetFilesByFileToMediaAssetBAndAManyToManyConnection"
                },
                key:"__typename": string:"MediaAsset"
            },
            {
                key:"uid": string:"eayunq366noearjrmrcjugowt6y",
                key:"mediaType": string:"audio",
                key:"title": {
                    key:"de": {
                        key:"value": string:"LNG is even worse than coal"
                    }
                },
                key:"duration": null:null,
                key:"files": {
                    key:"nodes": [
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://cba.media/wp-content/uploads/9/8/0000688489/lng-is-even-worse-than-coal.freie-radios.netmp320241209-lngisevenwor-132381.mp3",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"audio/mpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        }
                    ],
                    key:"__typename": string:"MediaAssetFilesByFileToMediaAssetBAndAManyToManyConnection"
                },
                key:"__typename": string:"MediaAsset"
            }
        ],
        key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemMediaAssetsByContentItemToMediaAssetAAndBManyToManyConnection"
    },
    key:"contentItemTranslations": {
        key:"nodes": [
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG est même pire que le charbon",
                key:"uid": string:"0bca16f2-e2c5-4110-bd84-8eaed4e88317",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>C'est la conclusion d'une nouvelle étude de Robert Howarth, professeur David R. Atkinson d'écologie et de biologie environnementale au Collège des sciences agricoles et de la vie de l'Université Cornell à New York. Son étude sur l'empreinte de gaz à effet de serre a été publiée quelques semaines avant le Sommet mondial sur le GNL à Berlin, où différentes entreprises plaident pour une utilisation accrue du GNL en tant que soi-disant technologie de transition pour répondre aux besoins énergétiques pendant la transition européenne vers les énergies renouvelables. Bien qu'il ne soit pas surprenant que le GNL contribue également au changement climatique en tant que combustible fossile, le fait qu'il soit même pire que le charbon, dont l'Allemagne a commencé à s'éloigner beaucoup plus rapidement, fournit des faits pour soutenir l'argument selon lequel l'accent mis par l'Europe sur le GNL en tant que source d'énergie est une énorme erreur de jugement. Dans une conversation avec Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explique ce que signifient les résultats de l'étude et quels aspects entourent cette question.</p>\n<p>Vous pouvez lire l'étude complète ici : https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:53:38.67",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>C'est la conclusion d'une nouvelle étude de Robert Howarth, le professeur David R. Atkinson d'écologie et de biologie environnementale au Collège d'agriculture et des sciences de la vie de l'Université Cornell à New York. Son étude sur l'empreinte de gaz à effet de serre était</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"fr",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:53:38.672",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG даже хуже угля",
                key:"uid": string:"0da5275b-6c5c-40cc-be04-e68ed1c2e723",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-12T11:55:33.88",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"ru",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG är till och med värre än kol",
                key:"uid": string:"0ecc165c-8f0c-4c7c-8a12-e280ef6436f7",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Detta är slutsatsen av en ny studie av Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinson-professor i ekologi och miljöbiologi vid College of Agriculture and Life Sciences vid Cornell University i New York. Hans studie om växthusgasavtrycket publicerades bara veckor innan World LNG Summit i Berlin började, där olika företag trycker på för att mer LNG ska användas som en så kallad broteknologi för att täcka energibehoven under den europeiska övergången till förnybara energikällor. Medan det inte kommer som någon överraskning att LNG också kommer att ytterligare bidra till klimatförändringar som en fossilt bränsle, ger det faktum att det är ännu värre än kol, från vilket Tyskland har börjat övergå mycket snabbare, fakta som stöder argumentet att det europeiska fokuset på LNG som en energikälla är en massiv felbedömning. I en intervju med Radio Corax förklarar Robert Howarth vad resultaten av studien betyder och vilka aspekter som omger denna fråga.</p>\n<p>Du kan läsa hela studien här: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:46:00.21",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Det är slutsatsen av en ny studie av Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinson-professorn i ekologi och miljöbiologi vid College of Agriculture and Life Sciences vid Cornell University i New York. Hans studie om växthusavtrycket var</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"sv",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:46:00.211",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG je čak gori od ugljena",
                key:"uid": string:"38d1ddc8-7109-4a95-9b16-f6e9a8351577",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>To je zaključak nove studije Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologije i okolišne biologije David R. Atkinson na Fakultetu poljoprivrede i znanosti o životu Sveučilišta Cornell u New Yorku. Njegova studija o ekološkom otisku stakleničkih plinova objavljena je samo nekoliko tjedana prije nego što je započeo Svjetski LNG summit u Berlinu, gdje različite korporacije traže veće korištenje LNG-a kao takozvane mostne tehnologije za pokrivanje energetskih potreba tijekom europske tranzicije na obnovljive izvore energije. Iako nije iznenađujuće da će LNG također dodatno pridonijeti klimatskim promjenama kao fosilno gorivo, činjenica da je čak i gori od ugljena, od kojeg je Njemačka počela brže se udaljavati, pruža činjenice koje podržavaju tvrdnju da je europski fokus na LNG kao izvor energije ogromna pogrešna procjena. U razgovoru s Radiom Corax, Robert Howarth objašnjava što rezultati studije znače i koji aspekti okružuju ovo pitanje.</p>\n<p>Možete pročitati cijelu studiju ovdje: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:34:24.634",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>To je zaključak nove studije Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologije i okolišne biologije David R. Atkinson na Fakultetu za poljoprivredu i znanosti o životu Sveučilišta Cornell u New Yorku. Njegova studija o stakleničkom otisku bila je</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"hr",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:34:24.635",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG on jopa pahempaa kuin hiili",
                key:"uid": string:"42a928f3-22cd-408d-bd36-c3db5cfecd92",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Tämä on johtopäätös uudesta tutkimuksesta, jonka on tehnyt Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinsonin ekologian ja ympäristön biologian professori Cornellin yliopiston maatalous- ja elämätieteiden korkeakoulussa New Yorkissa. Hänen tutkimuksensa kasvihuonekaasupäästöistä julkaistiin vain viikkoja ennen Berliinissä alkavaa Maailman LNG-huippukokousta, jossa eri yritykset ajavat LNG:n käytön lisäämistä niin sanottuna siirtymäteknologiana energian tarpeiden kattamiseksi Euroopan siirtyessä uusiutuviin energialähteisiin. Vaikka ei ole yllätys, että LNG lisää myös ilmastonmuutosta fossiilisena polttoaineena, se, että se on jopa pahempaa kuin hiili, josta Saksa on alkanut siirtyä pois paljon nopeammin, tarjoaa todisteita tukemaan väitettä, että Euroopan keskittyminen LNG:hen energialähteenä on valtava virhearvio. Keskustellessaan Radio Coraxin kanssa Robert Howarth selittää, mitä tutkimuksen tulokset tarkoittavat ja mitkä näkökohdat liittyvät tähän asiaan.</p>\n<p>Voit lukea koko tutkimuksen täältä: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:00:13.712",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Tämä on johtopäätös uudesta tutkimuksesta, jonka on tehnyt Robert Howarth, David R. Atkinsonin ekologian ja ympäristön biologian professori Cornellin yliopiston maatalous- ja elämätieteiden korkeakoulussa New Yorkissa. Hänen tutkimuksensa kasvihuonekaasupäästöistä oli</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"fi",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:01:01.478",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG е дори по-лошо от въглищата",
                key:"uid": string:"48428297-1f2d-4f71-84ac-cd7de9b7f01a",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Това е заключението на ново проучване от Робърт Хауърт, професор по екология и екологична биология в Колежа по земеделие и науки за живота на Корнелския университет в Ню Йорк. Неговото проучване за въглеродния отпечатък беше публикувано само седмици преди Световната среща на върха за втечнен природен газ в Берлин, където различни корпорации настояват за по-широкото използване на ВПГ като т.нар. мостова технология за покриване на енергийните нужди по време на европейския преход към възобновяеми източници на енергия. Докато не е изненада, че ВПГ също ще допринесе за климатичните промени като изкопаемо гориво, фактът, че е дори по-лошо от въглищата, от които Германия започна да се отдалечава много по-бързо, предоставя факти, които подкрепят аргумента, че европейският фокус върху ВПГ като източник на енергия е огромна грешка в преценката. В разговор с Радио Коракс, Робърт Хауърт обяснява какво означават резултатите от проучването и кои аспекти заобикалят този въпрос.</p>\n<p>Можете да прочетете пълното проучване тук: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:59:03.786",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Това е заключението на ново проучване от Робърт Хауърт, професор по екология и екологична биология в Колежа по земеделие и науки за живота на Корнелския университет в Ню Йорк. Неговото проучване за въглеродния отпечатък беше</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"bg",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:59:03.787",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG is zelfs erger dan kolen",
                key:"uid": string:"4e72066d-7592-4d6b-b87c-39857b75175e",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Dat is de conclusie van een nieuwe studie door Robert Howarth, de David R. Atkinson Professor in Ecologie en Milieu Biologie aan het College voor Landbouw en Levenswetenschappen van de Cornell Universiteit in New York. Zijn studie over de broeikasvoetafdruk werd gepubliceerd enkele weken voordat de World LNG Summit in Berlijn begon, waar verschillende bedrijven pleiten voor meer LNG als een zogenaamde brugtechnologie om in de energiebehoeften te voorzien tijdens de Europese overgang naar hernieuwbare energie. Hoewel het geen verrassing is dat LNG ook verder bijdraagt aan klimaatverandering als fossiele brandstof, biedt het feit dat het zelfs erger is dan kolen, waar Duitsland veel sneller van af begint te komen, feiten ter ondersteuning van het argument dat de Europese focus op LNG als energiebron een enorme miscalculatie is. In gesprek met Radio Corax legt Robert Howarth uit wat de resultaten van de studie betekenen en welke aspecten deze kwestie omringen.</p>\n<p>Je kunt de volledige studie hier lezen: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:52:30.692",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Dat is de conclusie van een nieuwe studie door Robert Howarth, de David R. Atkinson Professor in Ecologie en Milieu Biologie aan het College voor Landbouw en Levenswetenschappen van de Cornell Universiteit in New York. Zijn studie over de broeikasvoetafdruk was</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"nl",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:52:30.693",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG je ešte horšie ako uhlie",
                key:"uid": string:"637e0e55-0837-446c-9a6b-3ed210047921",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>To je záver novej štúdie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekológie a environmentálnej biológie na David R. Atkinson College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho štúdia o uhlíkovej stope skleníkových plynov bola publikovaná len niekoľko týždňov pred začiatkom Svetového LNG summitu v Berlíne, kde rôzne korporácie tlačia na väčšie využívanie LNG ako takzvanej mostnej technológie na pokrytie energetických potrieb počas európskej transformácie na obnoviteľné energie. Hoci nie je prekvapením, že LNG tiež ďalej prispeje k zmene klímy ako fosílne palivo, fakt, že je to ešte horšie ako uhlie, od ktorého sa Nemecko začalo odkláňať oveľa rýchlejšie, poskytuje fakty na podporu argumentu, že európsky dôraz na LNG ako zdroj energie je obrovské zlyhanie. V rozhovore s Rádiom Corax Robert Howarth vysvetľuje, čo výsledky štúdie znamenajú a aké aspekty obklopujú túto problematiku.</p>\n<p>Môžete si prečítať celú štúdiu tu: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:33:48.037",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>To je záver novej štúdie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekológie a environmentálnej biológie na David R. Atkinson College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho štúdia o uhlíkovej stope skleníkových plynov bola</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"sk",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:33:48.037",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG je čak gori od uglja",
                key:"uid": string:"75667d73-07eb-4234-812c-fdf6776905e3",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:45.499",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"sr",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"A LNG még rosszabb, mint a szén",
                key:"uid": string:"79d4e756-eceb-42e6-b604-3347ef56d716",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Ez Robert Howarth, a Cornell Egyetem Mezőgazdasági és Élettudományi Karának Ökológiai és Környezeti Biológiai David R. Atkinson Professzora által végzett új tanulmány következtetése. A tanulmány a üvegházhatású gázok lábnyomáról készült, és néhány héttel a berlini Világ LNG Csúcs előtt publikálták, ahol különböző vállalatok arra törekednek, hogy az LNG-t mint úgynevezett átmeneti technológiát használják az energiaigények kielégítésére az európai megújuló energiákra való átállás során. Mivel nem meglepő, hogy az LNG, mint fosszilis tüzelőanyag, továbbra is hozzájárul a klímaváltozáshoz, az a tény, hogy még rosszabb, mint a szén, amelytől Németország sokkal gyorsabban kezdett el átállni, olyan tényeket szolgáltat, amelyek alátámasztják azt az érvet, hogy az európai LNG-re való fókuszálás az energiaforrásként hatalmas tévedés. A Radio Corax-szal folytatott beszélgetésében Robert Howarth elmagyarázza, mit jelentenek a tanulmány eredményei, és mely aspektusok övezik ezt a kérdést.</p>\n<p>Teljes tanulmányt itt olvashatja: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:30:52.262",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Ez a következtetése egy új tanulmánynak, amelyet Robert Howarth, a Cornell Egyetem Mezőgazdasági és Élettudományi Karának Ökológiai és Környezeti Biológiai David R. Atkinson professzora készített New Yorkban. A tanulmánya az üvegházhatású gázok lábnyomáról szólt</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"hu",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:30:52.263",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG é ainda pior do que o carvão",
                key:"uid": string:"80f4094b-4e5a-42f0-b62e-04eb539da989",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Essa é a conclusão de um novo estudo de Robert Howarth, o Professor David R. Atkinson de Ecologia e Biologia Ambiental na Faculdade de Agricultura e Ciências da Vida da Universidade Cornell em Nova York. Seu estudo sobre a pegada de gases de efeito estufa foi publicado apenas algumas semanas antes do início da Cúpula Mundial de GNL em Berlim, onde diferentes corporações estão pressionando para que mais GNL seja utilizado como uma chamada tecnologia de transição para cobrir as necessidades energéticas durante a transição europeia para energias renováveis. Embora não seja surpresa que o GNL também contribua para a mudança climática como um combustível fóssil, o fato de que ele é ainda pior que o carvão, do qual a Alemanha começou a se afastar muito mais rapidamente, fornece fatos que apoiam o argumento de que o foco europeu no GNL como fonte de energia é um enorme erro de julgamento. Em conversa com a Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explica o que os resultados do estudo significam e quais aspectos cercam essa questão.</p>\n<p>Você pode ler o estudo completo aqui: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:17:41.418",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Essa é a conclusão de um novo estudo de Robert Howarth, o Professor David R. Atkinson de Ecologia e Biologia Ambiental na Faculdade de Agricultura e Ciências da Vida da Universidade Cornell em Nova York. Seu estudo sobre a pegada de gases de efeito estufa foi</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"pt",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:17:41.419",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG is even worse than coal",
                key:"uid": string:"886897fb-fea6-4ca6-ab6f-a6fd69d5a364",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was published just weeks before the World LNG Summit in Berlin started, where different corporations are pushing for more LNG being used as a so-called bridge technology to cover energy needs during the European transition to renewable energies. While it comes as no surprise that LNG will also further add to climate change as a fossil fuel, the fact that it is even worse than coal, from which Germany has started transitioning away much quicker, provides facts to support the argument that the European focus on LNG as a source of energy is a massive misjudgment. In conversation with Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explains what the results of the study mean and which aspects surround this issue.</p>\n<p>You can read the full study here: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:15:21.064",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"en",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:15:51.726",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG este chiar mai rău decât cărbunele",
                key:"uid": string:"bf3b9083-3361-4ecd-b96e-3c40b83833f4",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Asta este concluzia unui nou studiu realizat de Robert Howarth, profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecologie și Biologie de Mediu în Colegiul de Agricultură și Științe ale Vieții de la Universitatea Cornell din New York. Studiul său despre amprenta de seră a fost publicat cu câteva săptămâni înainte de începerea Summit-ului Mondial LNG de la Berlin, unde diferite corporații promovează utilizarea mai multor LNG ca o așa-numită tehnologie de tranziție pentru a acoperi nevoile energetice în timpul tranziției europene către energii regenerabile. Deși nu este o surpriză că LNG va contribui și el la schimbările climatice ca combustibil fosil, faptul că este chiar mai rău decât cărbunele, de la care Germania a început să se abată mult mai repede, oferă fapte care susțin argumentul că focalizarea europeană pe LNG ca sursă de energie este o eroare masivă de judecată. Într-o conversație cu Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explică ce înseamnă rezultatele studiului și ce aspecte înconjoară această problemă.</p>\n<p>Puteți citi studiul complet aici: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:03:56.328",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Asta este concluzia unui nou studiu realizat de Robert Howarth, profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecologie și Biologie a Mediului în Colegiul de Agricultură și Științe ale Vieții de la Universitatea Cornell din New York. Studiul său despre amprenta de seră a fost</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"ro",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:05:32.83",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG es incluso peor que el carbón",
                key:"uid": string:"d296202b-99b1-4ba2-a173-72f737b05efc",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Esa es la conclusión de un nuevo estudio de Robert Howarth, el Profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecología y Biología Ambiental en el Colegio de Agricultura y Ciencias de la Vida de la Universidad de Cornell en Nueva York. Su estudio sobre la huella de gases de efecto invernadero fue publicado solo unas semanas antes de que comenzara la Cumbre Mundial de GNL en Berlín, donde diferentes corporaciones están presionando para que se use más GNL como una supuesta tecnología puente para cubrir las necesidades energéticas durante la transición europea a energías renovables. Si bien no es una sorpresa que el GNL también contribuirá al cambio climático como un combustible fósil, el hecho de que sea incluso peor que el carbón, del cual Alemania ha comenzado a alejarse mucho más rápido, proporciona hechos que respaldan el argumento de que el enfoque europeo en el GNL como fuente de energía es un gran error de juicio. En conversación con Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explica lo que significan los resultados del estudio y qué aspectos rodean este tema.</p>\n<p>Puedes leer el estudio completo aquí: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:49:04.74",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Esa es la conclusión de un nuevo estudio de Robert Howarth, el Profesor David R. Atkinson de Ecología y Biología Ambiental en el Colegio de Agricultura y Ciencias de la Vida de la Universidad de Cornell en Nueva York. Su estudio sobre la huella de gases de efecto invernadero fue</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"es",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:49:04.741",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG навіть гірше, ніж вугілля",
                key:"uid": string:"e40e4b15-1b4a-46c5-99e6-db68b11da725",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-12T11:55:11.105",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"uk",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG jest nawet gorsze niż węgiel",
                key:"uid": string:"eb3af5e2-4f21-424d-8ea8-acc114ab96ae",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>To jest konkluzja nowego badania przeprowadzonego przez Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologii i biologii środowiskowej na Uniwersytecie Cornell w Nowym Jorku. Jego badanie dotyczące śladu węglowego zostało opublikowane zaledwie kilka tygodni przed rozpoczęciem Światowego Szczytu LNG w Berlinie, gdzie różne korporacje naciskają na większe wykorzystanie LNG jako tzw. technologii mostu, aby zaspokoić potrzeby energetyczne podczas europejskiej transformacji w kierunku energii odnawialnej. Choć nie jest zaskoczeniem, że LNG również przyczyni się do zmian klimatycznych jako paliwo kopalne, fakt, że jest jeszcze gorsze niż węgiel, od którego Niemcy zaczęły odchodzić znacznie szybciej, dostarcza faktów wspierających argument, że europejskie skupienie się na LNG jako źródle energii jest ogromnym błędem osądów. W rozmowie z Radiem Corax Robert Howarth wyjaśnia, co oznaczają wyniki badania i jakie aspekty otaczają tę kwestię.</p>\n<p>Pełne badanie można przeczytać tutaj: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:09:03.162",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>To jest konkluzja nowego badania przeprowadzonego przez Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologii i biologii środowiskowej imienia Davida R. Atkinsona w Kolegium Rolnictwa i Nauk o Życiu Uniwersytetu Cornell w Nowym Jorku. Jego badanie dotyczące śladu węglowego było</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"pl",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:09:22.961",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG, kömürden daha da kötü.",
                key:"uid": string:"ec5508e7-8846-4704-bd8e-40c6249fc6b2",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Bu, New York'taki Cornell Üniversitesi Tarım ve Hayat Bilimleri Koleji'nde Ekoloji ve Çevresel Biyoloji David R. Atkinson Profesörü Robert Howarth tarafından yapılan yeni bir çalışmanın sonucudur. Sera gazı ayak izi üzerine yaptığı çalışma, Berlin'de başlayan Dünya LNG Zirvesi'nden sadece birkaç hafta önce yayımlandı; burada farklı şirketler, Avrupa'nın yenilenebilir enerjiye geçişi sırasında enerji ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için LNG'nin bir köprü teknolojisi olarak daha fazla kullanılmasını savunuyor. LNG'nin bir fosil yakıt olarak iklim değişikliğine daha fazla katkıda bulunacağı sürpriz değilken, Almanya'nın çok daha hızlı bir şekilde geçiş yaptığı kömürden daha kötü olduğu gerçeği, Avrupa'nın enerji kaynağı olarak LNG'ye odaklanmasının büyük bir yanlış anlama olduğunu destekleyen veriler sunuyor. Radio Corax ile yaptığı röportajda, Robert Howarth çalışmanın sonuçlarının ne anlama geldiğini ve bu konuyla ilgili hangi yönlerin bulunduğunu açıklıyor.</p>\n<p>Tam çalışmayı burada okuyabilirsiniz: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:52:37.436",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Bu, New York'taki Cornell Üniversitesi Tarım ve Hayat Bilimleri Fakültesi'nde Ekoloji ve Çevresel Biyoloji David R. Atkinson Profesörü Robert Howarth tarafından yapılan yeni bir çalışmanın sonucudur. Sera gazı ayak izi üzerine yaptığı çalışma</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"tr",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:52:37.437",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG è anche peggio del carbone",
                key:"uid": string:"edb2f930-1780-4c2b-b510-9a2e6f4cdceb",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Questa è la conclusione di un nuovo studio di Robert Howarth, il Professore David R. Atkinson di Ecologia e Biologia Ambientale nel College of Agriculture and Life Sciences della Cornell University a New York. Il suo studio sull'impronta di gas serra è stato pubblicato solo poche settimane prima dell'inizio del World LNG Summit a Berlino, dove diverse corporazioni stanno spingendo per un maggiore utilizzo del GNL come cosiddetta tecnologia ponte per coprire i bisogni energetici durante la transizione europea verso le energie rinnovabili. Sebbene non sorprenda che il GNL contribuirà ulteriormente al cambiamento climatico come combustibile fossile, il fatto che sia addirittura peggiore del carbone, dal quale la Germania ha iniziato a distaccarsi molto più rapidamente, fornisce fatti a sostegno dell'argomento che il focus europeo sul GNL come fonte di energia sia un enorme errore di valutazione. In conversazione con Radio Corax, Robert Howarth spiega cosa significano i risultati dello studio e quali aspetti circondano questa questione.</p>\n<p>Puoi leggere lo studio completo qui: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:37:39.765",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Questa è la conclusione di un nuovo studio di Robert Howarth, il Professore David R. Atkinson di Ecologia e Biologia Ambientale nel College of Agriculture and Life Sciences della Cornell University a New York. Il suo studio sull'impronta di gas serra è stato</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"it",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T12:37:39.766",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG je ještě horší než uhlí",
                key:"uid": string:"f3d0fc78-4e24-4c8c-8d44-1e69fda9e5cf",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>To je závěr nové studie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologie a environmentální biologie na College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho studie o uhlíkové stopě skleníkových plynů byla publikována jen několik týdnů před začátkem Světového summitu o LNG v Berlíně, kde různé korporace prosazují větší využívání LNG jako takzvané přechodné technologie k pokrytí energetických potřeb během evropského přechodu na obnovitelné energie. I když není překvapením, že LNG také dále přispěje ke změně klimatu jako fosilní palivo, skutečnost, že je to ještě horší než uhlí, od kterého se Německo začalo odklánět mnohem rychleji, poskytuje fakta na podporu argumentu, že evropské zaměření na LNG jako zdroj energie je obrovským omylem. V rozhovoru s Radio Corax Robert Howarth vysvětluje, co výsledky studie znamenají a jaké aspekty tuto problematiku obklopují.</p>\n<p>Celou studii si můžete přečíst zde: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:36:47.089",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>To je závěr nové studie Roberta Howartha, profesora ekologie a environmentální biologie na College of Agriculture and Life Sciences na Cornell University v New Yorku. Jeho studie o uhlíkové stopě skleníkových plynů byla</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"cs",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:37:02.233",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"LNG ist sogar schlimmer als Kohle",
                key:"uid": string:"f47155b1-182d-4ff7-b589-5f191c8d7788",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Das ist die Schlussfolgerung einer neuen Studie von Robert Howarth, dem David R. Atkinson Professor für Ökologie und Umweltbiologie am College of Agriculture and Life Sciences der Cornell University in New York. Seine Studie über den Treibhausfußabdruck wurde nur wenige Wochen vor dem World LNG Summit in Berlin veröffentlicht, wo verschiedene Unternehmen für eine verstärkte Nutzung von LNG als sogenannte Brückentechnologie zur Deckung des Energiebedarfs während des europäischen Übergangs zu erneuerbaren Energien plädieren. Während es keine Überraschung ist, dass LNG als fossiler Brennstoff ebenfalls zur Klimaerwärmung beiträgt, liefert die Tatsache, dass es sogar schlimmer ist als Kohle, von der Deutschland viel schneller wegzukommen begonnen hat, Fakten, die das Argument unterstützen, dass der europäische Fokus auf LNG als Energiequelle ein massives Fehlurteil ist. Im Gespräch mit Radio Corax erklärt Robert Howarth, was die Ergebnisse der Studie bedeuten und welche Aspekte dieses Thema umgeben.</p>\n<p>Sie können die vollständige Studie hier lesen: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:37:04.239",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Das ist das Ergebnis einer neuen Studie von Robert Howarth, dem David R. Atkinson Professor für Ökologie und Umweltbiologie am College of Agriculture and Life Sciences der Cornell University in New York. Seine Studie über den ökologischen Fußabdruck von Treibhausgasen war</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"de",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:37:14.139",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Το LNG είναι ακόμη χειρότερο από τον άνθρακα",
                key:"uid": string:"fd95c9ae-41b0-433e-81da-8161cd03ee9c",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": null:null,
                key:"autoTeaserShort": null:null,
                key:"content": string:"<p>Αυτή είναι η σύγκριση μιας νέας μελέτης από τον Robert Howarth, τον καθηγητή Οικολογίας και Περιβαλλοντικής Βιολογίας David R. Atkinson στο Κολέγιο Γεωργίας και Επιστημών Ζωής του Πανεπιστημίου Cornell στη Νέα Υόρκη. Η μελέτη του σχετικά με το αποτύπωμα του θερμοκηπίου δημοσιεύθηκε μόλις εβδομάδες πριν από την έναρξη της Παγκόσμιας Συνόδου LNG στο Βερολίνο, όπου διάφορες εταιρείες πιέζουν για περισσότερη χρήση LNG ως μια λεγόμενη γέφυρα τεχνολογία για να καλύψουν τις ενεργειακές ανάγκες κατά τη διάρκεια της ευρωπαϊκής μετάβασης σε ανανεώσιμες πηγές ενέργειας. Ενώ δεν προκαλεί έκπληξη ότι το LNG θα προσθέσει επίσης στην κλιματική αλλαγή ως ορυκτό καύσιμο, το γεγονός ότι είναι ακόμη χειρότερο από τον άνθρακα, από τον οποίο η Γερμανία έχει αρχίσει να απομακρύνεται πολύ πιο γρήγορα, παρέχει στοιχεία που υποστηρίζουν την άποψη ότι η ευρωπαϊκή εστίαση στο LNG ως πηγή ενέργειας είναι μια τεράστια λανθασμένη εκτίμηση. Σε συνομιλία με το Radio Corax, ο Robert Howarth εξηγεί τι σημαίνουν τα αποτελέσματα της μελέτης και ποια ζητήματα περιβάλλουν αυτό το θέμα.</p>\n<p>Μπορείτε να διαβάσετε τη πλήρη μελέτη εδώ: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934</p>",
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eayunq366noeqrhavyjczxooyi2",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:25:43.653",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vayunq4cwyqwarw63uyp76bajfm",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": string:"<p>Αυτή είναι η σύγκριση μιας νέας μελέτης από τον Robert Howarth, τον καθηγητή David R. Atkinson στην Οικολογία και τη Βιολογία του Περιβάλλοντος στο Κολέγιο Γεωργίας και Επιστημών Ζωής του Πανεπιστημίου Cornell στη Νέα Υόρκη. Η μελέτη του σχετικά με το αποτύπωμα του θερμοκηπίου ήταν</p>",
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"el",
                key:"updatedAt": string:"2025-02-10T13:26:10.387",
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            }
        ],
        key:"totalCount": number:21,
        key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslationsConnection"
    },
    key:"__typename": string:"ContentItem"
}