REPCO

{
    key:"uid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
    key:"title": {
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"Lithuanian foreign policy: new position or new direction?"
        }
    },
    key:"subtitle": {
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:""
        }
    },
    key:"summary": {
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"<I>A change of government not only brings along new faces, but also novel solutions. Last year’s presidential and parliamentary elections in Lithuania showed the people’s will to transfer responsibility for foreign policy to President Gitanas Nausėda and his people. Does this mean a shift to another position or will it ensure the continuity of the country’s current direction?</I>"
        }
    },
    key:"content": {
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Lithuanian foreign policy has been dominated by two separate and distinct camps for some time: those driven by principles and values, and the rational pragmatists. Of course, there is a third camp whose supporters believe that Lithuania should return to the Russian sphere of influence. As of today, this third option makes up a third of the governing coalition.</p>\n<p>Both the value-oriented and pragmatic camps agree on the country’s overall direction – Lithuania should follow the pro-western, pro-European and pro-democratic development path. Both support and positively view the country’s membership in the EU and NATO. What then is the difference between the supporters of values and the pragmatists?</p>\n<p>The biggest differences appear when the discussion deals with the approaches to foreign policy and Lithuania’s position regarding geopolitical events. The value-based wing calls for active participation in the Eastern Partnership, opposition to anti-democratic moves in other parts of the world, and a strong position when it comes to China.</p>\n<p>The pragmatists agree with many of these goals and the overall development direction. However, for several decades they have also called for Lithuania to opt for a more careful position. This means following the leadership of other countries and more calculations concerning risks and costs.</p>\n<p>Perhaps the most significant example of the previous term was the issue of Taiwan. While the values supported by the conservatives and some liberals would lead to an open conflict with China, the other side was becoming tangibly anxious. The presidential administration was not against the idea of opening a representative office of Taiwan in Lithuania in the beginning. However, when Nausėda’s people began to gauge the possible reaction of the Chinese regime they gradually withdrew their support for such an idea. Later they would display a direct and open indignation at the callus (or arrogant) attitude of the government.</p>\n<p>The difference between these two camps also became clearer following the events in Georgia. The “hawks” of the value-based grouping, led by Žygimantas Pavilionis, would call from their opposition position for active participation in expressing support for the ousted President Salome Zurabishvili and the protesters in Georgian society. On the other side, there is a desire to balance the support shown, taking into account the reactions of other partners.</p>\n<p>Discussing his work as foreign minister, in an LRT interview, the former advisor to the president Kęstutis Budrys stressed that it is necessary to support Georgian aspirations to become a part of the European Union. He also said that the election results and the suppression of protests in Tbilisi are worrying, but that we should not interfere in the internal processes of other countries.</p>\n<p>This statement would sound logical if we accept the premise that foreign policy and the relations it brings with it are not a direct continuation of internal politics. Domestic politics inevitably shapes foreign policy. In order to change that situation, there is usually a need to influence the internal politics of other countries. It is not without reason that great modern thinkers and historians such as Niall Ferguson and Stephen Kotkin underline that the biggest mistake the West made when faced by the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine was the weak attempts to act against authoritarian regimes within its own borders. Too little support is given to (not necessarily) democratic oppositions and too little appreciation is given to the possibility that domestic political processes can easily overthrow regimes that try to appear rock solid and indestructible. This chance was seen during the rebellion of Yevgeny Prigozhin, who was halted only by the fact that he had no knowledge of how to proceed after he successfully led his Wagnerite goons towards Moscow.</p>\n<p>This is a mistake that western countries continue to make in the area of the Eastern Partnership. While there is a practice of moderate non-intervention and condemnations, Russia, China and other anti-democratic states do everything in their power to influence elections and corrupt or pressure potential political leaders. This process is ongoing, with attempts also being made to influence election results within these western countries themselves.</p>\n<p>The only way to save countries like Moldova and Georga from a Belarusian scenario is (or was) an active interference in their internal politics and the bold support of democratic leaders. This perspective raises many questions for this newfound position of rational pragmatism that is appearing in Lithuanian foreign policy and is seemingly growing in popularity. “We will not jump the gun,” “foreign policy will not be shaped by newspaper headlines” – this is how the president and his administration describe the new approach of Lithuanian foreign policy.</p>\n<p>Such an attitude is not doomed to be ineffective. It requires however a high level of authority, a strong diplomatic corps, significant investment, and a clear and strategic understanding of what the country plans to achieve through being careful, rational and pragmatic when acting to strengthen democracy.</p>\n<p>As of now, one must admit that the authority of the new leaders of Lithuanian foreign policy is not very strong in Europe.</p>\n<p>Not even the shadow of the president looming in the background is helping. Nausėda, during his first term in office, turned out to be nothing more than a steady looking traveller going to different meetings and repeating opinions from the position of a commentator. It must be said that all of the presidential initiatives were either borrowed or reformatted common European ideas. There was a lack of personal leadership or initiatives that were aimed at uniting leaders in the region or continent over a specific issue. There were no concrete strategies or plans, and there is nothing that tells us this could change now. Lithuania still is a solid participant that listens and agrees. However, it cannot hope to reach its own goals without stepping out by itself.</p>\n<p>So, the rational pragmatists promise another approach where the goals become very unclear. What will we look for in the idea of the Eastern Partnership? What if we recognize the illegitimate government and president in Georgia? Will we support the opposition forces? If yes, what mechanisms will be employed to achieve such a result, other than resolutions and projections of indignations?</p>\n<p>How will we help Ukraine in its aspirations of EU membership? How will we explain our decisions that allow for commercial entities to earn from military exports to third countries, which leads to different spare parts finding their way to Russia?</p>\n<p>What will our position be towards the United States of America if a new Trump administration proposes a peace plan equalling a capitulation with no benefits for Ukraine? Will we condemn it? Or perhaps we would support it, afraid of our own fate in the global game of world powers?</p>\n<p>How can we prevent the Hungarian and Slovak sabotage of the sanctions regime against Russia? What would we do if Russia employed a tactic of terrorist attacks on our critical infrastructure and power lines?</p>\n<p>The position of the value-based camp in these matters has sometimes been desperately bold, sometimes foolhardy, sometimes unwise, but at least clear cut. What does this new approach entail? Where are the goals and benefits of our pragmatic position?</p>\n<p>For now, we can say that the new approach to Lithuanian foreign policy will be calmer, more careful and based on the private deliberations of the president with a few other political leaders in the region. In any case, there will be more of an alignment than a leading role.</p>\n<p>Yes, this means taking less risks, with fewer opportunities to get burnt compared to operating above the country’s weight class or facing other unforeseen conditions along the way. But it also means fewer possibilities to influence the opinions of other countries and fewer chances to change the geopolitical environment. It also means fewer options to aid nations which might be late, but still desire to follow the path to democracy.</p>\n<p>Many observers almost agree in unison that the last few years have proven important when it comes to the context of geopolitical shakeups and attempts to retain influence. Authoritarian regimes and local radicals are challenging the democracies in our countries. They question the idea of international agreements, human rights and freedom. What then is possible in such a situation – the opportunism of values or rational pragmatism? This is an open question that not only does not unite but leads to even bigger differences in our discussions about foreign policy.</p>\n<p><em>This text was republished through the partnership between New Eastern Europe and LRT English</em>.</p>\n<p><em>Translated from Lithuanian by Nikodem Szczygłowski.</em></p>\n<p><strong>Paulius Gritėnas</strong> is a philosopher and commentator at <em>LRT.</em></p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> </span></p>\n"
        }
    },
    key:"titleTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"Литовска външна политика: нова позиция или нова посока?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"Litva zahraniční politika: nová pozice nebo nový směr?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"Litauische Außenpolitik: neue Position oder neue Richtung?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"Λιθουανική εξωτερική πολιτική: νέα θέση ή νέα κατεύθυνση;",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"Lithuanian foreign policy: new position or new direction?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"Política exterior de Lituania: ¿nueva posición o nueva dirección?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"Liettuan ulkopolitiikka: uusi asema vai uusi suunta?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"Politique étrangère lituanienne : nouvelle position ou nouvelle direction ?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"Litvanska vanjska politika: nova pozicija ili novi smjer?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"Litván külpolitika: új pozíció vagy új irány?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"Politica estera lituana: nuova posizione o nuova direzione?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"Litouwse buitenlandse politiek: nieuwe positie of nieuwe richting?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"Litewska polityka zagraniczna: nowa pozycja czy nowy kierunek?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"Política externa da Lituânia: nova posição ou nova direção?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"Politica externă a Lituaniei: nouă poziție sau nouă direcție?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"Литовская внешняя политика: новая позиция или новое направление?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"Litovská zahraničná politika: nová pozícia alebo nový smer?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"Litauisk utrikespolitik: ny position eller ny riktning?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"Litvanya dış politikası: yeni bir pozisyon mu yoksa yeni bir yön mü?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"Литовська зовнішня політика: нова позиція чи новий напрямок?",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        }
    },
    key:"subtitleTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        }
    },
    key:"summaryTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"<i>A change of government not only brings along new faces, but also novel solutions. Last year’s presidential and parliamentary elections in Lithuania showed the people’s will to transfer responsibility for foreign policy to President Gitanas Nausėda and his people. Does this mean a shift to another position or will it ensure the continuity of the country’s current direction?</i>",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        }
    },
    key:"contentTranslations": {
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"<p>Lithuanian foreign policy has been dominated by two separate and distinct camps for some time: those driven by principles and values, and the rational pragmatists. Of course, there is a third camp whose supporters believe that Lithuania should return to the Russian sphere of influence. As of today, this third option makes up a third of the governing coalition.</p>\n<p>Both the value-oriented and pragmatic camps agree on the country’s overall direction – Lithuania should follow the pro-western, pro-European and pro-democratic development path. Both support and positively view the country’s membership in the EU and NATO. What then is the difference between the supporters of values and the pragmatists?</p>\n<p>The biggest differences appear when the discussion deals with the approaches to foreign policy and Lithuania’s position regarding geopolitical events. The value-based wing calls for active participation in the Eastern Partnership, opposition to anti-democratic moves in other parts of the world, and a strong position when it comes to China.</p>\n<p>The pragmatists agree with many of these goals and the overall development direction. However, for several decades they have also called for Lithuania to opt for a more careful position. This means following the leadership of other countries and more calculations concerning risks and costs.</p>\n<p>Perhaps the most significant example of the previous term was the issue of Taiwan. While the values supported by the conservatives and some liberals would lead to an open conflict with China, the other side was becoming tangibly anxious. The presidential administration was not against the idea of opening a representative office of Taiwan in Lithuania in the beginning. However, when Nausėda’s people began to gauge the possible reaction of the Chinese regime they gradually withdrew their support for such an idea. Later they would display a direct and open indignation at the callus (or arrogant) attitude of the government.</p>\n<p>The difference between these two camps also became clearer following the events in Georgia. The “hawks” of the value-based grouping, led by Žygimantas Pavilionis, would call from their opposition position for active participation in expressing support for the ousted President Salome Zurabishvili and the protesters in Georgian society. On the other side, there is a desire to balance the support shown, taking into account the reactions of other partners.</p>\n<p>Discussing his work as foreign minister, in an LRT interview, the former advisor to the president Kęstutis Budrys stressed that it is necessary to support Georgian aspirations to become a part of the European Union. He also said that the election results and the suppression of protests in Tbilisi are worrying, but that we should not interfere in the internal processes of other countries.</p>\n<p>This statement would sound logical if we accept the premise that foreign policy and the relations it brings with it are not a direct continuation of internal politics. Domestic politics inevitably shapes foreign policy. In order to change that situation, there is usually a need to influence the internal politics of other countries. It is not without reason that great modern thinkers and historians such as Niall Ferguson and Stephen Kotkin underline that the biggest mistake the West made when faced by the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine was the weak attempts to act against authoritarian regimes within its own borders. Too little support is given to (not necessarily) democratic oppositions and too little appreciation is given to the possibility that domestic political processes can easily overthrow regimes that try to appear rock solid and indestructible. This chance was seen during the rebellion of Yevgeny Prigozhin, who was halted only by the fact that he had no knowledge of how to proceed after he successfully led his Wagnerite goons towards Moscow.</p>\n<p>This is a mistake that western countries continue to make in the area of the Eastern Partnership. While there is a practice of moderate non-intervention and condemnations, Russia, China and other anti-democratic states do everything in their power to influence elections and corrupt or pressure potential political leaders. This process is ongoing, with attempts also being made to influence election results within these western countries themselves.</p>\n<p>The only way to save countries like Moldova and Georga from a Belarusian scenario is (or was) an active interference in their internal politics and the bold support of democratic leaders. This perspective raises many questions for this newfound position of rational pragmatism that is appearing in Lithuanian foreign policy and is seemingly growing in popularity. “We will not jump the gun,” “foreign policy will not be shaped by newspaper headlines” – this is how the president and his administration describe the new approach of Lithuanian foreign policy.</p>\n<p>Such an attitude is not doomed to be ineffective. It requires however a high level of authority, a strong diplomatic corps, significant investment, and a clear and strategic understanding of what the country plans to achieve through being careful, rational and pragmatic when acting to strengthen democracy.</p>\n<p>As of now, one must admit that the authority of the new leaders of Lithuanian foreign policy is not very strong in Europe.</p>\n<p>Not even the shadow of the president looming in the background is helping. Nausėda, during his first term in office, turned out to be nothing more than a steady looking traveller going to different meetings and repeating opinions from the position of a commentator. It must be said that all of the presidential initiatives were either borrowed or reformatted common European ideas. There was a lack of personal leadership or initiatives that were aimed at uniting leaders in the region or continent over a specific issue. There were no concrete strategies or plans, and there is nothing that tells us this could change now. Lithuania still is a solid participant that listens and agrees. However, it cannot hope to reach its own goals without stepping out by itself.</p>\n<p>So, the rational pragmatists promise another approach where the goals become very unclear. What will we look for in the idea of the Eastern Partnership? What if we recognize the illegitimate government and president in Georgia? Will we support the opposition forces? If yes, what mechanisms will be employed to achieve such a result, other than resolutions and projections of indignations?</p>\n<p>How will we help Ukraine in its aspirations of EU membership? How will we explain our decisions that allow for commercial entities to earn from military exports to third countries, which leads to different spare parts finding their way to Russia?</p>\n<p>What will our position be towards the United States of America if a new Trump administration proposes a peace plan equalling a capitulation with no benefits for Ukraine? Will we condemn it? Or perhaps we would support it, afraid of our own fate in the global game of world powers?</p>\n<p>How can we prevent the Hungarian and Slovak sabotage of the sanctions regime against Russia? What would we do if Russia employed a tactic of terrorist attacks on our critical infrastructure and power lines?</p>\n<p>The position of the value-based camp in these matters has sometimes been desperately bold, sometimes foolhardy, sometimes unwise, but at least clear cut. What does this new approach entail? Where are the goals and benefits of our pragmatic position?</p>\n<p>For now, we can say that the new approach to Lithuanian foreign policy will be calmer, more careful and based on the private deliberations of the president with a few other political leaders in the region. In any case, there will be more of an alignment than a leading role.</p>\n<p>Yes, this means taking less risks, with fewer opportunities to get burnt compared to operating above the country’s weight class or facing other unforeseen conditions along the way. But it also means fewer possibilities to influence the opinions of other countries and fewer chances to change the geopolitical environment. It also means fewer options to aid nations which might be late, but still desire to follow the path to democracy.</p>\n<p>Many observers almost agree in unison that the last few years have proven important when it comes to the context of geopolitical shakeups and attempts to retain influence. Authoritarian regimes and local radicals are challenging the democracies in our countries. They question the idea of international agreements, human rights and freedom. What then is possible in such a situation – the opportunism of values or rational pragmatism? This is an open question that not only does not unite but leads to even bigger differences in our discussions about foreign policy.</p>\n<p><em>This text was republished through the partnership between New Eastern Europe and LRT English</em>.</p>\n<p><em>Translated from Lithuanian by Nikodem Szczygłowski.</em></p>\n<p><strong>Paulius Gritėnas</strong> is a philosopher and commentator at <em>LRT.</em></p>\n<p><span> </span></p>\n",
            key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"",
            key:"engine": null:null
        }
    },
    key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
    key:"pubDate": string:"2025-02-07T15:41:59",
    key:"contentUrl": {
        key:"en": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromContentUrl": boolean:true,
            key:"firstLanguage": boolean:true
        },
        key:"bg": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"cs": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"de": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"el": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"es": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"fi": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"fr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"hr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"hu": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"it": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"nl": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"pl": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"pt": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"ro": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"ru": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"sk": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"sr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"sv": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"tr": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        },
        key:"uk": {
            key:"value": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/?post_type=post&p=38669",
            key:"fromLang": string:"en"
        }
    },
    key:"languageDetails": {
        key:"OriginalLangauges": number:1,
        key:"ContentItemLangauges": number:1,
        key:"ContentItemTranslations": number:21
    },
    key:"originalLanguages": {
        key:"language_codes": [
            string:"en"
        ]
    },
    key:"revision": {
        key:"dateModified": string:"2025-02-07T14:42:11.149",
        key:"__typename": string:"Revision"
    },
    key:"mediaAssets": {
        key:"nodes": [
            {
                key:"uid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qarphootxfunytgc",
                key:"mediaType": string:"image",
                key:"title": {
                    key:"en": {
                        key:"value": string:"Chisinau,,Moldova,-,August,27,,2024:,Press,Conference,Held,By"
                    }
                },
                key:"duration": null:null,
                key:"files": {
                    key:"nodes": [
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-scaled-e1738938490965.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-300x209.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-1024x712.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-150x150.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-768x534.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-1536x1068.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-2048x1424.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-1024x683.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-1024x492.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-1024x660.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-1024x900.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-4096x2848.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-180x180.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-300x300.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-600x600.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-600x417.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        },
                        {
                            key:"contentUrl": string:"https://neweasterneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/shutterstock_2508717165-100x100.jpg",
                            key:"mimeType": string:"image/jpeg",
                            key:"__typename": string:"File"
                        }
                    ],
                    key:"__typename": string:"MediaAssetFilesByFileToMediaAssetBAndAManyToManyConnection"
                },
                key:"__typename": string:"MediaAsset"
            }
        ],
        key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemMediaAssetsByContentItemToMediaAssetAAndBManyToManyConnection"
    },
    key:"contentItemTranslations": {
        key:"nodes": [
            {
                key:"title": string:"Liettuan ulkopolitiikka: uusi asema vai uusi suunta?",
                key:"uid": string:"0f57afe0-d88e-4b9a-9bb9-62e7a851c2be",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kriittiset Kohdat:**\n\n1. **Eroavat Ulkopoliittiset Lähestymistavat:** Liettuan ulkopolitiikka on tällä hetkellä jakautunut arvoihin perustuvan leirin ja pragmaattisen leirin välillä, jossa ensimmäinen puolustaa aktiivista demokratian ja ihmisoikeuksien tukemista, kun taas pragmaattinen leiri suosii varovaisia, harkittuja vastauksia geopoliittisiin tapahtumiin, erityisesti suhteissa Kiinaan ja Venäjään.\n\n2. **Pragmaatismin Haasteet:** Pragmaattinen lähestymistapa herättää merkittäviä kysymyksiä Liettuan kyvystä vaikuttaa alueelliseen politiikkaan ja tukea demokraattisia liikkeitä, erityisesti ottaen huomioon nykyisen johtajuuden havaittu tehottomuus ja tarpeen selkeälle strategialle.\n\n3. **Geopoliittiset Vaikutukset:** Näiden leirien välinen jatkuva taistelu heijastaa laajempia geopoliittisia jännitteitä, kun autoritaariset hallitukset haastavat demokraattiset arvot, mikä herättää keskustelua siitä, tulisiko Liettuan priorisoida periaatteellisia näkemyksiä vai omaksua enemmän tilannekohtainen, pragmaattinen lähestymistapa.\n\n**Teaser:**\nKun Liettua navigoi monimutkaisessa geopoliittisessa maisemassa, sen ulkopolitiikkaa määrittelee yhä enemmän kahden erillisen leirin välinen konflikti: yksi puolustaa periaatteellista tukea demokratialle ja toinen kehottaa varovaisuuteen ja pragmaattisuuteen. Koska merkittävä osa hallituskoalitiosta suosii paluuta Venäjän vaikutukseen, herää kysymyksiä tämän uuden pragmaattisen lähestymistavan tehokkuudesta. Voiko Liettua ylläpitää pro-eurooppalaista kantaansa samalla kun se tasapainottaa kansainvälisiin suhteisiin liittyviä riskejä? Tutki tämän kehittyvän ulkopolitiikan haasteita ja vaikutuksia maailmassa, jossa autoritaarisuus on nousussa.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Liettuan ulkopolitiikka on tienhaarassa, jakautuneena arvoihin perustuvien puolustajien ja pragmaattisten realistien välillä. Kun jännitteet nousevat globaalisti, keskustelu siitä, miten navigoida suhteissa autoritaarisiin hallintoihin samalla kun tuetaan demokraattisia pyrkimyksiä, voimistuu. Minkä suunnan Liettua valitsee tässä monimutkaisessa geopoliittisessa maisemassa? Klikkaa tutkiaksesi lisää.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.284",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"fi",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litvanska vanjska politika: nova pozicija ili novi smjer?",
                key:"uid": string:"19b8fc90-22dd-4cac-b1e4-7449921443c6",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritične točke:**\n\n1. **Različiti pristupi vanjskoj politici:** Litvanska vanjska politika trenutno je podijeljena između kampa vođenog vrijednostima koji se zalaže za aktivnu podršku demokraciji i ljudskim pravima, i pragmatičnog kampa koji favorizira oprezne, proračunate odgovore na geopolitičke događaje, posebno u vezi s odnosima s Kinom i Rusijom.\n\n2. **Izazovi pragmatizma:** Pragmatični pristup postavlja značajna pitanja o sposobnosti Litvanije da utječe na regionalnu politiku i podrži demokratske pokrete, posebno u svjetlu percipirane neučinkovitosti trenutnog vodstva i potrebe za jasnom strategijom.\n\n3. **Geopolitičke implikacije:** Neprestana borba između ovih kampova odražava šire geopolitičke napetosti, dok autoritarni režimi izazivaju demokratske vrijednosti, potičući rasprave o tome treba li Litvanija prioritizirati principijelne stavove ili usvojiti oportunističniji, pragmatični pristup.\n\n**Teaser:**\nDok Litvanija navigira složenim geopolitičkim pejzažem, njezina vanjska politika sve više se definira sukobom između dva različita kampa: jedan se zalaže za principijelnu podršku demokraciji, a drugi poziva na oprez i pragmatizam. S značajnim dijelom vladajuće koalicije koja favorizira povratak ruskog utjecaja, postavljaju se pitanja o učinkovitosti ovog novog pragmatičnog pristupa. Može li Litvanija održati svoj proeuropski stav dok balansira rizike međunarodnih odnosa? Istražite izazove i implikacije ove evoluirajuće vanjske politike u svijetu gdje autoritarizam raste.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litvanijska vanjska politika je na raskrižju, podijeljena između zagovornika vođenih vrijednostima i pragmatičnih realista. Kako globalne napetosti rastu, rasprava se pojačava oko toga kako upravljati odnosima s autoritarnim režimima dok se podržavaju demokratske aspiracije. Koji smjer će Litvanija odabrati u ovom složenom geopolitičkom krajoliku? Kliknite za daljnje istraživanje.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.496",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"hr",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Politica externă a Lituaniei: nouă poziție sau nouă direcție?",
                key:"uid": string:"1dc9048a-f12f-4e04-8848-ed7403d803ca",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Puncte Critice:**\n\n1. **Abordări Divergente în Politica Externă:** Politica externă a Lituaniei este în prezent împărțită între un grup bazat pe valori care pledează pentru sprijin activ al democrației și drepturilor omului, și un grup pragmatic care favorizează răspunsuri prudente și calculate la evenimentele geopolitice, în special în ceea ce privește relațiile cu China și Rusia.\n\n2. **Provocările Pragmatismului:** Abordarea pragmatică ridică întrebări semnificative cu privire la capacitatea Lituaniei de a influența politica regională și de a sprijini mișcările democratice, mai ales în lumina perceputei ineficiențe a actualei conduceri și a necesității unei strategii clare.\n\n3. **Implicatii Geopolitice:** Lupta continuă între aceste grupuri reflectă tensiuni geopolitice mai ample, pe măsură ce regimurile autoritare contestă valorile democratice, provocând dezbateri cu privire la faptul dacă Lituania ar trebui să prioritizeze poziții principiale sau să adopte o abordare mai oportunistă și pragmatică.\n\n**Teaser:**\nPe măsură ce Lituania navighează un peisaj geopolitic complex, politica sa externă este din ce în ce mai mult definită de un conflict între două grupuri distincte: unul care pledează pentru sprijin principial al democrației și celălalt care îndeamnă la prudență și pragmatism. Cu o porțiune semnificativă a coaliției guvernante favorizând o întoarcere la influența rusă, apar întrebări cu privire la eficiența acestei noi abordări pragmatice. Poate Lituania să își mențină poziția pro-europeană în timp ce echilibrează riscurile relațiilor internaționale? Explorați provocările și implicațiile acestei politici externe în evoluție într-o lume în care autoritarismul este în creștere.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Politica externă a Lituaniei se află la o răscruce, împărțită între susținătorii orientați spre valori și realiștii pragmatici. Pe măsură ce tensiunile cresc la nivel global, dezbaterea se intensifică cu privire la modul de a naviga relațiile cu regimurile autoritare în timp ce se susțin aspirațiile democratice. Ce direcție va alege Lituania în acest peisaj geopolitic complex? Faceți clic pentru a explora mai departe.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.186",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"ro",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litouwse buitenlandse politiek: nieuwe positie of nieuwe richting?",
                key:"uid": string:"1ecabcbc-60ad-4521-bd5d-56ad610fee94",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritieke Punten:**\n\n1. **Afwijkende Buitenlandse Beleidsbenaderingen:** De Litouwse buitenlandse politiek is momenteel verdeeld tussen een waarden-gedreven kamp dat pleit voor actieve ondersteuning van democratie en mensenrechten, en een pragmatisch kamp dat de voorkeur geeft aan voorzichtige, berekende reacties op geopolitieke gebeurtenissen, met name met betrekking tot de relaties met China en Rusland.\n\n2. **Uitdagingen van Pragmatismus:** De pragmatische benadering roept aanzienlijke vragen op over Litouwen's vermogen om regionale politiek te beïnvloeden en democratische bewegingen te ondersteunen, vooral in het licht van de waargenomen ineffectiviteit van de huidige leiding en de noodzaak van een duidelijke strategie.\n\n3. **Geopolitieke Implicaties:** De voortdurende strijd tussen deze kampen weerspiegelt bredere geopolitieke spanningen, aangezien autoritaire regimes de democratische waarden uitdagen, wat leidt tot debatten over de vraag of Litouwen principiële standpunten moet prioriteren of een meer opportunistische, pragmatische benadering moet aannemen.\n\n**Teaser:**\nTerwijl Litouwen een complex geopolitiek landschap navigeert, wordt zijn buitenlandse beleid steeds meer gedefinieerd door een botsing tussen twee verschillende kampen: het ene dat pleit voor principiële ondersteuning van democratie en het andere dat oproept tot voorzichtigheid en pragmatisme. Met een aanzienlijk deel van de regeringscoalitie dat de voorkeur geeft aan een terugkeer naar Russische invloed, rijzen er vragen over de effectiviteit van deze nieuwe pragmatische benadering. Kan Litouwen zijn pro-Europese houding handhaven terwijl het de risico's van internationale betrekkingen in balans houdt? Verken de uitdagingen en implicaties van dit evoluerende buitenlandse beleid in een wereld waar autoritarisme in opkomst is.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"De buitenlandse politiek van Litouwen staat op een kruispunt, verdeeld tussen waarde-gedreven voorstanders en pragmatische realisten. Terwijl de spanningen wereldwijd toenemen, verscherpt de discussie over hoe om te gaan met autoritaire regimes terwijl democratische aspiraties worden ondersteund. Welke richting zal Litouwen kiezen in dit complexe geopolitieke landschap? Klik om verder te verkennen.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.936",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"nl",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litvanya dış politikası: yeni bir pozisyon mu yoksa yeni bir yön mü?",
                key:"uid": string:"47b10df6-b903-422f-b0ff-6da39ead1df8",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritik Noktalar:**\n\n1. **Farklı Dış Politika Yaklaşımları:** Litvanya'nın dış politikası şu anda, demokrasi ve insan haklarının aktif desteklenmesini savunan değer odaklı bir kamp ile, özellikle Çin ve Rusya ile ilişkiler konusunda jeopolitik olaylara temkinli ve hesaplı yanıtlar vermeyi tercih eden pragmatik bir kamp arasında bölünmüştür.\n\n2. **Pragmatizmin Zorlukları:** Pragmatik yaklaşım, Litvanya'nın bölgesel politikaları etkileme ve demokratik hareketleri destekleme yeteneği hakkında önemli sorular ortaya çıkarmaktadır; özellikle mevcut liderliğin algılanan etkisizliği ve net bir stratejiye duyulan ihtiyaç göz önüne alındığında.\n\n3. **Jeopolitik Etkiler:** Bu kamplar arasındaki devam eden mücadele, otoriter rejimlerin demokratik değerlere meydan okumasıyla daha geniş jeopolitik gerilimleri yansıtmaktadır ve Litvanya'nın ilkesel duruşları mı yoksa daha fırsatçı, pragmatik bir yaklaşım mı benimsemesi gerektiği konusunda tartışmalara yol açmaktadır.\n\n**Tanıtım:**\nLitvanya karmaşık bir jeopolitik manzarada yol alırken, dış politikası giderek iki farklı kamp arasındaki çatışma ile tanımlanmaktadır: biri demokrasiye ilkesel destek verilmesini savunurken, diğeri temkin ve pragmatizm çağrısında bulunmaktadır. Hükümet koalisyonunun önemli bir kısmının Rus etkisine dönüşü desteklemesiyle, bu yeni pragmatik yaklaşımın etkinliği hakkında sorular ortaya çıkmaktadır. Litvanya, uluslararası ilişkilerin risklerini dengeleyerek pro-Avrupa duruşunu sürdürebilir mi? Otoriterizmin yükseldiği bir dünyada, bu gelişen dış politikanın zorluklarını ve etkilerini keşfedin.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litvanya'nın dış politikası bir kavşakta, değer odaklı savunucular ile pragmatik realistler arasında bölünmüş durumda. Küresel olarak gerilimler artarken, otoriter rejimlerle ilişkileri nasıl yöneteceği ve demokratik beklentileri nasıl destekleyeceği konusunda tartışmalar yoğunlaşıyor. Litvanya, bu karmaşık jeopolitik manzarada hangi yönü seçecek? Daha fazla keşfetmek için tıklayın.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.133",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"tr",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litva zahraniční politika: nová pozice nebo nový směr?",
                key:"uid": string:"68d2f982-27d0-46d1-be58-785c7bdb20bc",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritické body:**\n\n1. **Rozdílné přístupy k zahraniční politice:** Litevská zahraniční politika je v současnosti rozdělena mezi tábor zaměřený na hodnoty, který prosazuje aktivní podporu demokracie a lidských práv, a pragmatický tábor, který upřednostňuje opatrné, promyšlené reakce na geopolitické události, zejména pokud jde o vztahy s Čínou a Ruskem.\n\n2. **Výzvy pragmatismu:** Pragmatický přístup vyvolává významné otázky o schopnosti Litvy ovlivnit regionální politiku a podporovat demokratické hnutí, zejména vzhledem k vnímané neefektivnosti současného vedení a potřebě jasné strategie.\n\n3. **Geopolitické důsledky:** Probíhající boj mezi těmito tábory odráží širší geopolitické napětí, protože autoritářské režimy zpochybňují demokratické hodnoty, což vyvolává debaty o tom, zda by Litva měla upřednostnit principy nebo přijmout oportunističtější, pragmatický přístup.\n\n**Teaser:**\nJak Litva naviguje složitou geopolitickou krajinou, její zahraniční politika je stále více definována střetem mezi dvěma odlišnými tábory: jedním, který prosazuje principy podpory demokracie, a druhým, který vyzývá k opatrnosti a pragmatismu. S významnou částí vládní koalice, která upřednostňuje návrat ruského vlivu, se objevují otázky o účinnosti tohoto nového pragmatického přístupu. Může Litva udržet svůj proevropský postoj, zatímco vyvažuje rizika mezinárodních vztahů? Prozkoumejte výzvy a důsledky této vyvíjející se zahraniční politiky ve světě, kde autoritářství roste.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litva má zahraniční politiku na křižovatce, rozdělenou mezi zastánce hodnot a pragmatické realisty. Jak se globálně zvyšují napětí, debata se intenzivně zaměřuje na to, jak navigovat vztahy s autoritářskými režimy, zatímco podporujeme demokratické aspirace. Jakým směrem se Litva v této složité geopolitické krajině vydá? Klikněte pro další prozkoumání.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.547",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"cs",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litvanska spoljna politika: nova pozicija ili novi pravac?",
                key:"uid": string:"78755511-dce3-403f-a0c7-f322bb3bc303",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritične tačke:**\n\n1. **Različiti pristupi spoljnoj politici:** Spoljna politika Litvanije je trenutno podeljena između kampa koji se zalaže za aktivnu podršku demokratiji i ljudskim pravima, i pragmatičnog kampa koji favorizuje oprezne, proračunate odgovore na geopolitičke događaje, posebno u vezi sa odnosima sa Kinom i Rusijom.\n\n2. **Izazovi pragmatizma:** Pragmatični pristup postavlja značajna pitanja o sposobnosti Litvanije da utiče na regionalnu politiku i podrži demokratske pokrete, posebno u svetlu percipirane neefikasnosti trenutnog vođstva i potrebe za jasnom strategijom.\n\n3. **Geopolitičke implikacije:** Neprekidna borba između ovih kampova odražava šire geopolitičke tenzije, dok autoritarni režimi izazivaju demokratske vrednosti, pokrećući rasprave o tome da li Litvanija treba da prioritetizuje principijelne stavove ili da usvoji oportunističkiji, pragmatični pristup.\n\n**Teaser:**\nDok Litvanija navigira složenim geopolitičkim pejzažom, njena spoljna politika sve više se definiše sukobom između dva različita kampa: jedan se zalaže za principijelnu podršku demokratiji, dok drugi poziva na oprez i pragmatizam. Sa značajnim delom vladajuće koalicije koja favorizuje povratak ruskog uticaja, postavljaju se pitanja o efikasnosti ovog novog pragmatičnog pristupa. Može li Litvanija održati svoj proevropski stav dok balansira rizike međunarodnih odnosa? Istražite izazove i implikacije ove evoluirajuće spoljnoj politici u svetu gde autoritarizam raste.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litvanijska spoljna politika je na raskršću, podeljena između zagovornika vođenih vrednostima i pragmatičnih realista. Kako tenzije globalno rastu, debata se pojačava oko toga kako navigirati odnosima sa autoritarnim režimima dok se podržavaju demokratske aspiracije. Koji pravac će Litvanija izabrati u ovom složenom geopolitičkom pejzažu? Kliknite da istražite dalje.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.474",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"sr",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litván külpolitika: új pozíció vagy új irány?",
                key:"uid": string:"7dfc6372-622b-4a37-a900-bbd63994f181",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritikus Pontok:**\n\n1. **Eltérő Külföldi Politikai Megközelítések:** A litván külpolitika jelenleg megosztott egy értékekre épülő tábor között, amely a demokrácia és az emberi jogok aktív támogatását szorgalmazza, és egy pragmatikus tábor között, amely a geopolitikai eseményekre adott óvatos, megfontolt válaszokat részesíti előnyben, különösen Kínával és Oroszországgal kapcsolatosan.\n\n2. **A Pragmatizmus Kihívásai:** A pragmatikus megközelítés jelentős kérdéseket vet fel Litvánia regionális politikai befolyásának és a demokratikus mozgalmak támogatásának képességéről, különösen a jelenlegi vezetés észlelt hatékonyságának hiányában és a világos stratégia szükségessége miatt.\n\n3. **Geopolitikai Következmények:** E táborok közötti folyamatos küzdelem szélesebb geopolitikai feszültségeket tükröz, mivel az autoriter rezsimek kihívást jelentenek a demokratikus értékekre, ami vitákat vált ki arról, hogy Litvániának a principális álláspontokat kellene-e előnyben részesítenie, vagy inkább egy opportunista, pragmatikus megközelítést kellene alkalmaznia.\n\n**Előzetes:**\nMiközben Litvánia egy összetett geopolitikai tájat navigál, külpolitikáját egyre inkább két eltérő tábor közötti összecsapás határozza meg: az egyik a demokrácia principális támogatását szorgalmazza, míg a másik óvatosságot és pragmatizmust sürget. A kormányzati koalíció jelentős része, amely a orosz befolyás visszatérését támogatja, kérdéseket vet fel ennek az új pragmatikus megközelítésnek a hatékonyságáról. Képes-e Litvánia megőrizni pro-európai álláspontját, miközben egyensúlyozza a nemzetközi kapcsolatok kockázatait? Fedezze fel ennek a fejlődő külpolitikának a kihívásait és következményeit egy olyan világban, ahol az autoritarizmus felerősödik.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litvánia külpolitikája kereszteződésben áll, az értékvezérelt szószólók és a pragmatikus realista között megosztva. Ahogy a feszültségek globálisan növekednek, a vita fokozódik arról, hogyan lehet navigálni a kapcsolatokban a tekintélyelvű rezsimekkel, miközben támogatjuk a demokratikus törekvéseket. Milyen irányt választ Litvánia ebben a bonyolult geopolitikai tájban? Kattintson a további felfedezéshez.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.696",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"hu",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Politica estera lituana: nuova posizione o nuova direzione?",
                key:"uid": string:"80236bcd-6373-49ed-9b21-c2548d512c6b",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Punti Critici:**\n\n1. **Approcci Divergenti alla Politica Estera:** La politica estera lituana è attualmente divisa tra un campo guidato dai valori che sostiene attivamente la democrazia e i diritti umani, e un campo pragmatico che favorisce risposte caute e calcolate agli eventi geopolitici, in particolare riguardo ai rapporti con la Cina e la Russia.\n\n2. **Sfide del Pragmatismo:** L'approccio pragmatico solleva domande significative sulla capacità della Lituania di influenzare la politica regionale e sostenere i movimenti democratici, specialmente alla luce della percepita inefficacia dell'attuale leadership e della necessità di una strategia chiara.\n\n3. **Implicazioni Geopolitiche:** La lotta in corso tra questi campi riflette tensioni geopolitiche più ampie, poiché i regimi autoritari sfidano i valori democratici, sollevando dibattiti su se la Lituania dovrebbe dare priorità a posizioni principiate o adottare un approccio più opportunistico e pragmatico.\n\n**Teaser:**\nMentre la Lituania naviga in un complesso panorama geopolitico, la sua politica estera è sempre più definita da uno scontro tra due campi distinti: uno che sostiene un supporto principato alla democrazia e l'altro che esorta alla cautela e al pragmatismo. Con una parte significativa della coalizione di governo che favorisce un ritorno all'influenza russa, sorgono domande sull'efficacia di questo nuovo approccio pragmatico. Può la Lituania mantenere la sua posizione pro-europea bilanciando i rischi delle relazioni internazionali? Esplora le sfide e le implicazioni di questa politica estera in evoluzione in un mondo in cui l'autoritarismo è in aumento.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"La politica estera della Lituania è a un bivio, divisa tra sostenitori guidati dai valori e realisti pragmatici. Con l'aumento delle tensioni a livello globale, il dibattito si intensifica su come gestire le relazioni con i regimi autoritari mentre si sostiene le aspirazioni democratiche. Quale direzione sceglierà la Lituania in questo complesso panorama geopolitico? Clicca per esplorare ulteriormente.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.781",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"it",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litovská zahraničná politika: nová pozícia alebo nový smer?",
                key:"uid": string:"872b8363-ab66-425a-b126-ace468e113da",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritické body:**\n\n1. **Rozdielne prístupy k zahraničnej politike:** Zahraničná politika Litvy je v súčasnosti rozdelená medzi táborom orientovaným na hodnoty, ktorý podporuje aktívnu podporu demokracie a ľudských práv, a pragmatickým táborom, ktorý uprednostňuje opatrné, vypočítané reakcie na geopolitické udalosti, najmä pokiaľ ide o vzťahy s Čínou a Ruskom.\n\n2. **Výzvy pragmatizmu:** Pragmatický prístup vyvoláva významné otázky o schopnosti Litvy ovplyvniť regionálnu politiku a podporovať demokratické hnutia, najmä v súvislosti s vnímanou neefektívnosťou súčasného vedenia a potrebou jasnej stratégie.\n\n3. **Geopolitické dôsledky:** Prebiehajúci boj medzi týmito táborami odráža širšie geopolitické napätia, keď autoritárske režimy spochybňujú demokratické hodnoty, čo vyvoláva debaty o tom, či by Litva mala uprednostniť zásadové postoje alebo prijať oportunistickejší, pragmatický prístup.\n\n**Teaser:**\nKeď Litva naviguje zložitým geopolitickým prostredím, jej zahraničná politika je čoraz viac definovaná konfliktom medzi dvoma odlišnými táborami: jedným, ktorý obhajuje zásadovú podporu demokracie, a druhým, ktorý nalieha na opatrnosť a pragmatizmus. S významnou časťou vládnej koalície, ktorá uprednostňuje návrat ruského vplyvu, sa objavujú otázky o efektívnosti tohto nového pragmatického prístupu. Môže Litva udržať svoj proeurópsky postoj, zatiaľ čo vyvažuje riziká medzinárodných vzťahov? Preskúmajte výzvy a dôsledky tejto vyvíjajúcej sa zahraničnej politiky vo svete, kde autoritárstvo narastá.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litva má zahraničnú politiku na križovatke, rozdelenú medzi hodnotovo orientovaných obhajcov a pragmatických realistov. Ako sa napätie vo svete zvyšuje, debata sa intenzívne vedie o tom, ako navigovať vzťahy s autoritárskymi režimami pri podpore demokratických ambícií. Akým smerom sa Litva rozhodne ísť v tejto zložitej geopolitickej krajine? Kliknite a preskúmajte ďalej.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.597",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"sk",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Литовская внешняя политика: новая позиция или новое направление?",
                key:"uid": string:"904a1a16-654e-4ce6-8e02-2c4af7594d9b",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Критические моменты:**\n\n1. **Разные подходы к внешней политике:** Внешняя политика Литвы в настоящее время разделена между лагерем, ориентированным на ценности, который выступает за активную поддержку демократии и прав человека, и прагматичным лагерем, который предпочитает осторожные, взвешенные ответы на геополитические события, особенно в отношении отношений с Китаем и Россией.\n\n2. **Проблемы прагматизма:** Прагматичный подход ставит значительные вопросы о способности Литвы влиять на региональную политику и поддерживать демократические движения, особенно в свете воспринимаемой неэффективности текущего руководства и необходимости четкой стратегии.\n\n3. **Геополитические последствия:** Продолжающаяся борьба между этими лагерями отражает более широкие геополитические напряженности, поскольку авторитарные режимы бросают вызов демократическим ценностям, вызывая дебаты о том, должна ли Литва приоритизировать принципиальные позиции или принять более оппортунистический, прагматичный подход.\n\n**Тизер:**\nПока Литва ориентируется в сложном геополитическом ландшафте, ее внешняя политика все больше определяется столкновением между двумя различными лагерями: один выступает за принципиальную поддержку демократии, а другой призывает к осторожности и прагматизму. С значительной частью правящей коалиции, выступающей за возвращение российского влияния, возникают вопросы о целесообразности этого нового прагматичного подхода. Может ли Литва сохранить свою проевропейскую позицию, балансируя риски международных отношений? Изучите проблемы и последствия этой развивающейся внешней политики в мире, где авторитаризм нарастает.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Внешняя политика Литвы находится на распутье, разделенная между сторонниками ценностей и прагматичными реалистами. По мере нарастания глобальных напряжений дебаты усиливаются по поводу того, как выстраивать отношения с авторитарными режимами, поддерживая демократические устремления. Какое направление выберет Литва в этом сложном геополитическом ландшафте? Нажмите, чтобы узнать больше.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.08",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"ru",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litauisk utrikespolitik: ny position eller ny riktning?",
                key:"uid": string:"adf84a04-bcd1-4228-9995-fce3defaae35",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritiska punkter:**\n\n1. **Divergerande utrikespolitiska tillvägagångssätt:** Litauens utrikespolitik är för närvarande splittrad mellan ett värderingsdrivet läger som förespråkar aktivt stöd för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter, och ett pragmatiskt läger som förespråkar försiktiga, beräknade svar på geopolitiska händelser, särskilt när det gäller relationerna med Kina och Ryssland.\n\n2. **Utmaningar med pragmatism:** Det pragmatiska tillvägagångssättet väcker betydande frågor om Litauens förmåga att påverka regional politik och stödja demokratiska rörelser, särskilt med tanke på den upplevda ineffektiviteten hos den nuvarande ledningen och behovet av en tydlig strategi.\n\n3. **Geopolitiska implikationer:** Den pågående kampen mellan dessa läger speglar bredare geopolitiska spänningar, eftersom auktoritära regimer utmanar demokratiska värderingar, vilket väcker debatter om huruvida Litauen bör prioritera principfasta ställningstaganden eller anta en mer opportunistisk, pragmatisk strategi.\n\n**Teaser:**\nNär Litauen navigerar i ett komplext geopolitiskt landskap definieras dess utrikespolitik alltmer av en kollision mellan två distinkta läger: ett som förespråkar principfast stöd för demokrati och det andra som uppmanar till försiktighet och pragmatism. Med en betydande del av den styrande koalitionen som förespråkar en återgång till ryskt inflytande, uppstår frågor om effektiviteten av detta nya pragmatiska tillvägagångssätt. Kan Litauen upprätthålla sin pro-europeiska hållning samtidigt som man balanserar riskerna med internationella relationer? Utforska utmaningarna och implikationerna av denna utvecklande utrikespolitik i en värld där auktoritarism är på uppgång.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litauens utrikespolitik står vid ett vägskäl, uppdelad mellan värdebaserade förespråkare och pragmatiska realister. När spänningarna ökar globalt intensifieras debatten om hur man ska navigera relationerna med auktoritära regimer samtidigt som man stöder demokratiska strävanden. Vilken riktning kommer Litauen att välja i detta komplexa geopolitiska landskap? Klicka för att utforska vidare.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.384",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"sv",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Литовска външна политика: нова позиция или нова посока?",
                key:"uid": string:"b70888ae-934e-406d-b27f-5fcc437f7807",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Критични точки:**\n\n1. **Разделени подходи към външната политика:** Външната политика на Литва в момента е разделена между лагер, основан на ценности, който призовава за активна подкрепа на демокрацията и правата на човека, и прагматичен лагер, който предпочита предпазливи, изчислени отговори на геополитическите събития, особено по отношение на отношенията с Китай и Русия.\n\n2. **Предизвикателства на прагматизма:** Прагматичният подход поставя значителни въпроси относно способността на Литва да влияе на регионалната политика и да подкрепя демократичните движения, особено на фона на възприеманата неефективност на настоящото ръководство и необходимостта от ясна стратегия.\n\n3. **Геополитически последици:** Продължаващата борба между тези лагери отразява по-широки геополитически напрежения, тъй като авторитарните режими предизвикват демократичните ценности, провокирайки дебати относно това дали Литва трябва да приоритизира принципни позиции или да приеме по-опортюнистичен, прагматичен подход.\n\n**Тийзър:**\nДокато Литва навигира в сложен геополитически ландшафт, нейната външна политика все повече се определя от сблъсък между два различни лагера: един, който призовава за принципна подкрепа на демокрацията, и друг, който настоява за предпазливост и прагматизъм. Съществуваща значителна част от управляващата коалиция, която предпочита връщането на руското влияние, възникват въпроси относно ефективността на този нов прагматичен подход. Може ли Литва да запази проевропейската си позиция, докато балансира рисковете на международните отношения? Изследвайте предизвикателствата и последиците от тази развиваща се външна политика в свят, в който авторитаризмът нараства.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Външната политика на Литва е на кръстопът, разделена между защитниците на ценностите и прагматичните реалисти. С нарастващото напрежение в световен мащаб, дебатът се засилва относно начина на управление на отношенията с авторитарни режими, докато се подкрепят демократичните амбиции. Каква посока ще избере Литва в този сложен геополитически ландшафт? Кликнете, за да разгледате по-подробно.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.235",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"bg",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Lithuanian foreign policy: new position or new direction?",
                key:"uid": string:"b76a7e6e-b96c-4637-93c7-218e2e50b7cc",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Critical Points:**\n\n1. **Diverging Foreign Policy Approaches:** Lithuanian foreign policy is currently split between a values-driven camp advocating for active support of democracy and human rights, and a pragmatic camp favoring cautious, calculated responses to geopolitical events, particularly regarding relations with China and Russia.\n\n2. **Challenges of Pragmatism:** The pragmatic approach raises significant questions about Lithuania's ability to influence regional politics and support democratic movements, especially in light of the perceived ineffectiveness of the current leadership and the need for a clear strategy.\n\n3. **Geopolitical Implications:** The ongoing struggle between these camps reflects broader geopolitical tensions, as authoritarian regimes challenge democratic values, prompting debates on whether Lithuania should prioritize principled stances or adopt a more opportunistic, pragmatic approach.\n\n**Teaser:**\nAs Lithuania navigates a complex geopolitical landscape, its foreign policy is increasingly defined by a clash between two distinct camps: one advocating for principled support of democracy and the other urging caution and pragmatism. With a significant portion of the governing coalition favoring a return to Russian influence, questions arise about the effectiveness of this new pragmatic approach. Can Lithuania maintain its pro-European stance while balancing the risks of international relations? Explore the challenges and implications of this evolving foreign policy in a world where authoritarianism is on the rise.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Lithuania's foreign policy is at a crossroads, divided between value-driven advocates and pragmatic realists. As tensions rise globally, the debate intensifies over how to navigate relationships with authoritarian regimes while supporting democratic aspirations. What direction will Lithuania choose in this complex geopolitical landscape? Click to explore further.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.395",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"en",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litewska polityka zagraniczna: nowa pozycja czy nowy kierunek?",
                key:"uid": string:"d802ee71-c296-49aa-8cad-c4c58bf2b630",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Punkty krytyczne:**\n\n1. **Rozbieżne podejścia do polityki zagranicznej:** Litewska polityka zagraniczna jest obecnie podzielona między obozem opartym na wartościach, który opowiada się za aktywnym wsparciem dla demokracji i praw człowieka, a obozem pragmatycznym, który preferuje ostrożne, wyważone reakcje na wydarzenia geopolityczne, szczególnie w odniesieniu do relacji z Chinami i Rosją.\n\n2. **Wyzwania pragmatyzmu:** Pragmatyczne podejście rodzi istotne pytania dotyczące zdolności Litwy do wpływania na politykę regionalną i wspierania ruchów demokratycznych, zwłaszcza w świetle postrzeganej nieskuteczności obecnego przywództwa oraz potrzeby jasnej strategii.\n\n3. **Implikacje geopolityczne:** Trwająca walka między tymi obozami odzwierciedla szersze napięcia geopolityczne, ponieważ reżimy autorytarne kwestionują wartości demokratyczne, co wywołuje debaty na temat tego, czy Litwa powinna priorytetowo traktować zasady czy przyjąć bardziej oportunistyczne, pragmatyczne podejście.\n\n**Zajawka:**\nW miarę jak Litwa porusza się w złożonym krajobrazie geopolitycznym, jej polityka zagraniczna jest coraz bardziej definiowana przez konflikt między dwoma odrębnymi obozami: jednym opowiadającym się za zasadniczym wsparciem dla demokracji, a drugim wzywającym do ostrożności i pragmatyzmu. Przy znacznej części koalicji rządowej sprzyjającej powrotowi rosyjskiego wpływu, pojawiają się pytania o skuteczność tego nowego pragmatycznego podejścia. Czy Litwa może utrzymać swoje proeuropejskie stanowisko, równocześnie balansując ryzyko związane z relacjami międzynarodowymi? Zbadaj wyzwania i implikacje tej ewoluującej polityki zagranicznej w świecie, w którym autorytaryzm rośnie.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Polityka zagraniczna Litwy znajduje się na rozdrożu, podzielona między zwolenników wartości a pragmatycznych realistów. W miarę wzrostu napięć na świecie, debata zaostrza się na temat tego, jak nawigować relacje z reżimami autorytarnymi, jednocześnie wspierając demokratyczne aspiracje. Jaką drogę wybierze Litwa w tym skomplikowanym krajobrazie geopolitycznym? Kliknij, aby dowiedzieć się więcej.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.831",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"pl",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Λιθουανική εξωτερική πολιτική: νέα θέση ή νέα κατεύθυνση;",
                key:"uid": string:"e494efc2-0acf-48ed-92ff-fa68d586c30e",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Κρίσιμα Σημεία:**\n\n1. **Αποκλίνουσες Προσεγγίσεις Εξωτερικής Πολιτικής:** Η εξωτερική πολιτική της Λιθουανίας είναι αυτή τη στιγμή διχασμένη μεταξύ ενός στρατοπέδου που υποστηρίζει τις αξίες και προ Advocates for active support of democracy and human rights, and a pragmatic camp favoring cautious, calculated responses to geopolitical events, particularly regarding relations with China and Russia.\n\n2. **Προκλήσεις του Πραγματισμού:** Η πραγματιστική προσέγγιση εγείρει σημαντικά ερωτήματα σχετικά με την ικανότητα της Λιθουανίας να επηρεάσει την περιφερειακή πολιτική και να υποστηρίξει δημοκρατικά κινήματα, ειδικά υπό το πρίσμα της αντιληπτής αναποτελεσματικότητας της τρέχουσας ηγεσίας και της ανάγκης για μια σαφή στρατηγική.\n\n3. **Γεωπολιτικές Επιπτώσεις:** Η συνεχιζόμενη πάλη μεταξύ αυτών των στρατοπέδων αντικατοπτρίζει ευρύτερες γεωπολιτικές εντάσεις, καθώς τα αυταρχικά καθεστώτα αμφισβητούν τις δημοκρατικές αξίες, προκαλώντας συζητήσεις σχετικά με το αν η Λιθουανία θα πρέπει να δώσει προτεραιότητα σε αρχές ή να υιοθετήσει μια πιο ευκαιριακή, πραγματιστική προσέγγιση.\n\n**Teaser:**\nΚαθώς η Λιθουανία πλοηγείται σε ένα πολύπλοκο γεωπολιτικό τοπίο, η εξωτερική της πολιτική καθορίζεται ολοένα και περισσότερο από μια σύγκρουση μεταξύ δύο διακριτών στρατοπέδων: ενός που υποστηρίζει την αρχή της δημοκρατίας και ενός άλλου που προτρέπει σε προσοχή και πραγματισμό. Με ένα σημαντικό ποσοστό της κυβερνητικής συμμαχίας να ευνοεί την επιστροφή στην ρωσική επιρροή, προκύπτουν ερωτήματα σχετικά με την αποτελεσματικότητα αυτής της νέας πραγματιστικής προσέγγισης. Μπορεί η Λιθουανία να διατηρήσει τη φιλοευρωπαϊκή της στάση ενώ ισορροπεί τους κινδύνους των διεθνών σχέσεων; Εξερευνήστε τις προκλήσεις και τις επιπτώσεις αυτής της εξελισσόμενης εξωτερικής πολιτικής σε έναν κόσμο όπου ο αυταρχισμός είναι σε άνοδο.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Η εξωτερική πολιτική της Λιθουανίας βρίσκεται σε σταυροδρόμι, διαιρεμένη μεταξύ υποστηρικτών που βασίζονται σε αξίες και πρακτικών ρεαλιστών. Καθώς οι εντάσεις αυξάνονται παγκοσμίως, η συζήτηση εντείνεται σχετικά με το πώς να πλοηγηθούν οι σχέσεις με αυταρχικά καθεστώτα ενώ υποστηρίζονται οι δημοκρατικές φιλοδοξίες. Ποια κατεύθυνση θα επιλέξει η Λιθουανία σε αυτό το σύνθετο γεωπολιτικό τοπίο; Κάντε κλικ για να εξερευνήσετε περαιτέρω.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.331",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"el",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Política exterior de Lituania: ¿nueva posición o nueva dirección?",
                key:"uid": string:"e99cd249-09f4-4d60-8d84-8bb97f42905f",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Puntos Críticos:**\n\n1. **Enfoques de Política Exterior Divergentes:** La política exterior de Lituania está actualmente dividida entre un grupo impulsado por valores que aboga por un apoyo activo a la democracia y los derechos humanos, y un grupo pragmático que favorece respuestas cautelosas y calculadas a los eventos geopolíticos, particularmente en lo que respecta a las relaciones con China y Rusia.\n\n2. **Desafíos del Pragmatismo:** El enfoque pragmático plantea preguntas significativas sobre la capacidad de Lituania para influir en la política regional y apoyar movimientos democráticos, especialmente a la luz de la ineficacia percibida del liderazgo actual y la necesidad de una estrategia clara.\n\n3. **Implicaciones Geopolíticas:** La lucha en curso entre estos grupos refleja tensiones geopolíticas más amplias, ya que los regímenes autoritarios desafían los valores democráticos, lo que provoca debates sobre si Lituania debería priorizar posturas basadas en principios o adoptar un enfoque más oportunista y pragmático.\n\n**Avance:**\nA medida que Lituania navega por un complejo paisaje geopolítico, su política exterior está cada vez más definida por un choque entre dos grupos distintos: uno que aboga por un apoyo basado en principios a la democracia y el otro que insta a la cautela y el pragmatismo. Con una parte significativa de la coalición gobernante a favor de un regreso a la influencia rusa, surgen preguntas sobre la efectividad de este nuevo enfoque pragmático. ¿Puede Lituania mantener su postura proeuropea mientras equilibra los riesgos de las relaciones internacionales? Explore los desafíos y las implicaciones de esta política exterior en evolución en un mundo donde el autoritarismo está en aumento.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"La política exterior de Lituania está en una encrucijada, dividida entre defensores impulsados por valores y realistas pragmáticos. A medida que las tensiones aumentan a nivel global, el debate se intensifica sobre cómo navegar las relaciones con regímenes autoritarios mientras se apoya las aspiraciones democráticas. ¿Qué dirección elegirá Lituania en este complejo panorama geopolítico? Haz clic para explorar más.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.879",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"es",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Litauische Außenpolitik: neue Position oder neue Richtung?",
                key:"uid": string:"ed51ed7d-9627-4918-82f0-e8baa12a85f0",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Kritische Punkte:**\n\n1. **Abweichende Außenpolitikansätze:** Die litauische Außenpolitik ist derzeit zwischen einem werteorientierten Lager, das für aktive Unterstützung von Demokratie und Menschenrechten plädiert, und einem pragmatischen Lager, das vorsichtige, kalkulierte Reaktionen auf geopolitische Ereignisse, insbesondere in Bezug auf die Beziehungen zu China und Russland, favorisiert, gespalten.\n\n2. **Herausforderungen des Pragmatismus:** Der pragmatische Ansatz wirft erhebliche Fragen zur Fähigkeit Litauens auf, die regionale Politik zu beeinflussen und demokratische Bewegungen zu unterstützen, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die wahrgenommene Ineffektivität der aktuellen Führung und die Notwendigkeit einer klaren Strategie.\n\n3. **Geopolitische Implikationen:** Der anhaltende Kampf zwischen diesen Lagern spiegelt breitere geopolitische Spannungen wider, da autoritäre Regime demokratische Werte herausfordern, was Debatten darüber auslöst, ob Litauen prinzipielle Positionen priorisieren oder einen opportunistischeren, pragmatischen Ansatz verfolgen sollte.\n\n**Teaser:**\nWährend Litauen sich in einer komplexen geopolitischen Landschaft bewegt, wird seine Außenpolitik zunehmend durch einen Konflikt zwischen zwei unterschiedlichen Lagern definiert: einem, das für prinzipielle Unterstützung der Demokratie eintritt, und einem anderen, das Vorsicht und Pragmatismus fordert. Mit einem erheblichen Teil der Regierungskoalition, der eine Rückkehr zum russischen Einfluss favorisiert, stellen sich Fragen zur Effektivität dieses neuen pragmatischen Ansatzes. Kann Litauen seine pro-europäische Haltung aufrechterhalten und gleichzeitig die Risiken internationaler Beziehungen ausbalancieren? Erkunden Sie die Herausforderungen und Implikationen dieser sich entwickelnden Außenpolitik in einer Welt, in der der Autoritarismus im Aufstieg ist.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Litauens Außenpolitik steht an einem Scheideweg, geteilt zwischen wertorientierten Befürwortern und pragmatischen Realisten. Während die Spannungen weltweit zunehmen, intensiviert sich die Debatte darüber, wie man Beziehungen zu autoritären Regimen navigiert und gleichzeitig demokratische Bestrebungen unterstützt. Welche Richtung wird Litauen in dieser komplexen geopolitischen Landschaft einschlagen? Klicken Sie hier, um weiter zu erkunden.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.446",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"de",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Литовська зовнішня політика: нова позиція чи новий напрямок?",
                key:"uid": string:"ede8f5c4-9544-4221-91da-f9e3e4c787c7",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Критичні Пункти:**\n\n1. **Різні Підходи до Зовнішньої Політики:** Зовнішня політика Литви наразі розділена між табором, що керується цінностями, який виступає за активну підтримку демократії та прав людини, та прагматичним табором, що віддає перевагу обережним, розрахованим відповідям на геополітичні події, особливо щодо відносин з Китаєм та Росією.\n\n2. **Виклики Прагматизму:** Прагматичний підхід ставить значні питання щодо здатності Литви впливати на регіональну політику та підтримувати демократичні рухи, особливо з огляду на сприйняту неефективність поточного керівництва та необхідність чіткої стратегії.\n\n3. **Геополітичні Наслідки:** Тривала боротьба між цими таборами відображає ширші геополітичні напруження, оскільки авторитарні режими кидають виклик демократичним цінностям, що викликає дебати про те, чи повинна Литва надавати пріоритет принциповим позиціям або приймати більш опортуністичний, прагматичний підхід.\n\n**Тізер:**\nОскільки Литва орієнтується в складному геополітичному ландшафті, її зовнішня політика все більше визначається зіткненням між двома різними таборами: один виступає за принципову підтримку демократії, а інший закликає до обережності та прагматизму. З значною частиною урядової коаліції, що підтримує повернення до російського впливу, виникають питання щодо ефективності цього нового прагматичного підходу. Чи може Литва зберегти свою проєвропейську позицію, балансуючи ризики міжнародних відносин? Досліджуйте виклики та наслідки цієї еволюціонуючої зовнішньої політики у світі, де авторитаризм зростає.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"Зовнішня політика Литви перебуває на роздоріжжі, розділена між прихильниками цінностей та прагматичними реалістами. У міру зростання глобальних напружень дебати посилюються щодо того, як налагоджувати відносини з авторитарними режимами, підтримуючи демократичні прагнення. Який напрямок обере Литва в цьому складному геополітичному ландшафті? Натисніть, щоб дізнатися більше.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:47.033",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"uk",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Política externa da Lituânia: nova posição ou nova direção?",
                key:"uid": string:"eea6a153-cc84-41a0-8571-84e0ab056a93",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Pontos Críticos:**\n\n1. **Abordagens Divergentes de Política Externa:** A política externa da Lituânia está atualmente dividida entre um grupo orientado por valores que defende o apoio ativo à democracia e aos direitos humanos, e um grupo pragmático que favorece respostas cautelosas e calculadas a eventos geopolíticos, particularmente em relação às relações com a China e a Rússia.\n\n2. **Desafios do Pragmatismo:** A abordagem pragmática levanta questões significativas sobre a capacidade da Lituânia de influenciar a política regional e apoiar movimentos democráticos, especialmente à luz da ineficácia percebida da liderança atual e da necessidade de uma estratégia clara.\n\n3. **Implicações Geopolíticas:** A luta em curso entre esses grupos reflete tensões geopolíticas mais amplas, à medida que regimes autoritários desafiam valores democráticos, provocando debates sobre se a Lituânia deve priorizar posturas baseadas em princípios ou adotar uma abordagem mais oportunista e pragmática.\n\n**Teaser:**\nÀ medida que a Lituânia navega por uma paisagem geopolítica complexa, sua política externa é cada vez mais definida por um conflito entre dois grupos distintos: um que defende o apoio baseado em princípios à democracia e outro que pede cautela e pragmatismo. Com uma parte significativa da coalizão governante favorecendo um retorno à influência russa, surgem questões sobre a eficácia dessa nova abordagem pragmática. A Lituânia pode manter sua postura pró-europeia enquanto equilibra os riscos das relações internacionais? Explore os desafios e implicações dessa política externa em evolução em um mundo onde o autoritarismo está em ascensão.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"A política externa da Lituânia está em uma encruzilhada, dividida entre defensores orientados por valores e realistas pragmáticos. À medida que as tensões aumentam globalmente, o debate se intensifica sobre como navegar nas relações com regimes autoritários enquanto se apoia aspirações democráticas. Que direção a Lituânia escolherá neste complexo cenário geopolítico? Clique para explorar mais.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.986",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"pt",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            },
            {
                key:"title": string:"Politique étrangère lituanienne : nouvelle position ou nouvelle direction ?",
                key:"uid": string:"ef7235d1-bf2a-490e-8daa-4f585c5349fa",
                key:"autoTeaserLong": string:"**Points Critiques :**\n\n1. **Approches de Politique Étrangère Divergentes :** La politique étrangère lituanienne est actuellement divisée entre un camp axé sur les valeurs plaidant pour un soutien actif à la démocratie et aux droits de l'homme, et un camp pragmatique favorisant des réponses prudentes et calculées aux événements géopolitiques, en particulier en ce qui concerne les relations avec la Chine et la Russie.\n\n2. **Défis du Pragmatism :** L'approche pragmatique soulève des questions significatives sur la capacité de la Lituanie à influencer la politique régionale et à soutenir les mouvements démocratiques, surtout à la lumière de l'inefficacité perçue du leadership actuel et du besoin d'une stratégie claire.\n\n3. **Implications Géopolitiques :** La lutte en cours entre ces camps reflète des tensions géopolitiques plus larges, alors que les régimes autoritaires défient les valeurs démocratiques, suscitant des débats sur la question de savoir si la Lituanie devrait privilégier des positions de principe ou adopter une approche plus opportuniste et pragmatique.\n\n**Teaser :**  \nAlors que la Lituanie navigue dans un paysage géopolitique complexe, sa politique étrangère est de plus en plus définie par un affrontement entre deux camps distincts : l'un plaidant pour un soutien de principe à la démocratie et l'autre appelant à la prudence et au pragmatisme. Avec une part significative de la coalition gouvernementale en faveur d'un retour à l'influence russe, des questions se posent sur l'efficacité de cette nouvelle approche pragmatique. La Lituanie peut-elle maintenir sa position pro-européenne tout en équilibrant les risques des relations internationales ? Explorez les défis et les implications de cette politique étrangère en évolution dans un monde où l'autoritarisme est en hausse.",
                key:"autoTeaserShort": string:"La politique étrangère de la Lituanie est à un carrefour, divisée entre les partisans des valeurs et les réalistes pragmatiques. Alors que les tensions mondiales augmentent, le débat s'intensifie sur la manière de naviguer dans les relations avec les régimes autoritaires tout en soutenant les aspirations démocratiques. Quelle direction la Lituanie choisira-t-elle dans ce paysage géopolitique complexe ? Cliquez pour explorer davantage.",
                key:"content": null:null,
                key:"contentCleaned": null:null,
                key:"contentItemUid": string:"eaywy4xjwh2qqreecfotael5bwu",
                key:"createdAt": string:"2025-02-17T07:24:46.646",
                key:"engine": string:"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
                key:"metadata": null:null,
                key:"revisionId": string:"vaywy4xjwsdiarj3w5izyzfdtsi",
                key:"subtitle": null:null,
                key:"summary": null:null,
                key:"summaryCleaned": null:null,
                key:"targetLanguage": string:"fr",
                key:"updatedAt": null:null,
                key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslation"
            }
        ],
        key:"totalCount": number:21,
        key:"__typename": string:"ContentItemTranslationsConnection"
    },
    key:"__typename": string:"ContentItem"
}